He didnt state his opinion, thats the point.
His opinion was the opposite of what he told you - thats a lie.
This is in the dominion discovery.
Yes, I watched him. Fox didnt settle just to be nice.
It seems the lies are more comfortable then the truth for so many.
Tucker lied and thats a fact.
Why do you want to give a liar a pass?
Jesus Christ man, you are totally taking this whole thing on Tucker and Dominion WAY out of proportion and acting like a damn drama queen.
Many of the anchors on FOX pushed the Dominion hoax longer than they should have.....YES, we agree on that. However, in regard to Tucker, which this thread is about, you are totally misrepresenting how things went. Tucker discussed the Dominion voting fraud on his show immediately after the election. However, within 48 hours, he totally disavowed himself from that position. Go back and watch his show where he had Sydney Powell on it. He ripped her to shreds and afterward mentioned that his show would not provide false information that she was pushing. The emails within the disposition prove my point on this. So what you are complaining about occurred within a big whopping 48-hour period. So spare me the bullshit drama already. He never went on about dominion after that very short period, so you are exaggerating shit big time.
Go back and watch that episode. Many people, yes Trump supporters, prematurely stopped watching his show because they thought he was avoiding the truth, when in fact he WAS giving the truth by not supporting her. He mentioned in emails, which are in the disposition, saying how much of a dumbass Sydney Powell was, a complete nutcase I believe is what he and others called her.
Tucker was one of the first, if not the first to disavow her claims because there was no actual proof. If you want to call him a "liar" for that short period, then go on ahead and do so. Now some of the others bought into her Kool-Aid and kept it going for longer periods. Rupert knew and never put a stop to it.
I'm not a Tucker nuthugger, but I like the guy a lot. If you have watched him like you say you do, then you would know that he came out many of times on his show and apologized when he was proven wrong, or gavce wrong information. He actually apologized for the Sydney Powell bullshit, but that may have escaped your mind? Hardly anybody does that these days unless they are forced to do so, and he took a lot of unjust heat for it at the time.
What makes Tucker special is that he goes after everybody, even Trump/MAGA supporters, so that is why many like to watch him.
Now did he go on to talk about election fraud from other different angles? Hell yea he did! Why wouldn't he if there was substantial evidence to bring forth for discussion.
Now one matter and angle that people like Newsmax and I believe the My Pillow guy have is that they looked at the Dominion case from the angle that their algorithms are at possible risk for tampering. Alan Dershowitz has mentioned this. He does not believe that Dominion themselves did anything, but that they are at risk from outside threats for tampering. However, they do not want to make their algorithms open and transparent, and in doing so, it makes them look like they have something to hide. <-----Not saying they are at fault. If proven that they are susceptible to somebody hacking their machines, then there would be supporting evidence that the election and voting was possibly compromised. That said, good luck finding anybody to look into that though.