We were told the mRNA vaccines were ~95% "effective." Of course we know that was a lie. We just didn't know how BIG of a lie that was.
The issue is relative vs. absolute risk reduction.
"While the high estimates of risk reduction are based upon relative risks, the absolute risk reduction is a more appropriate metric for a member of the general public to determine whether a vaccination provides a meaningful risk reduction personally. In that analysis, utilizing data supplied by the vaccine makers to the FDA, the Moderna vaccine at the time of interim analysis demonstrated an absolute risk reduction of 1.1% (p=0.004), while the Pfizer vaccine absolute risk reduction was 0.7% (p
How many of you would have still taken the mRNA vaccines if the manufacturers published and promoted the data that they were 1.1% effective at reducing your risk of infection? Would you have bothered?
Source document:
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021
Sent from my SM-G781V using Tapatalk