Anytime you ask someone who holds to the theories of Brodel, where to get news, they'll say Al Jazeera or BBC, and I will freely admit that they are significantly less corrupt and doctored. But it is still information, in very large part, that is handed from one source to the next, being redacted and sometimes outright manufactured, to achieve a goal OTHER than truthful enlightenment.
Brodel, I hear what you are saying, but you don't hear me. What makes your internet source less foolproof than mine? What makes your tv source more trustworthy than mine? What they TELL you is unbiased, is mostly just somebody's opinion of the middle of the bell curve, because depending on the 10,000 different "sources" for info on any given subject, 99.999% of them are just conjecturing based on other sources who conjectured on other sources who had second hand knowledge of what someone saw firsthand, and we know how unreliable even eye-witness accounts can be.
Again, it's all twisted half-truths and best-guesses.