For there to be an impeachment, there needs to be evidence of an impeachable offense.
The more I actually learn about every new situation that the hysterical left jumps all over every day and proclaims to be worse than watergate, the more I realize this all has the appearance of a political witch hunt.
By all means, the dems should keep investigating anything and everything they think points to wrongdoing - that is their right. But there is zero evidence as of yet of Trump doing anything illegal. About all we have evidence that he has been guilty of over the last 23 months is saying and tweeting some dumb things, and he and his staffers committing various other political faux pas that have led to embarassment - they don't communicate as well as they should, and they don't seem to be politically sophisticated enough to avoid many of the political booby traps set up by congress and the senate - not to mention the leftist mainstream media, un-elected govt hacks, and orgs led and funded by Soros, Obama, the Clintons, et al.
These people are all still enraged because they lost power in the 2016 elections. We were never supposed to have another Republican president again.
When you have liberal Constitutional legal experts like Jonathan Turley and liberal academic experts on Russia like Steve Cohen saying that these hysterics have been wrong so far, and that we have no evidence of any illegal activity so far from anyone other than Gen Flynn, it's obvious that the new stories that come out daily (from "anonymous sources" cited by the failing NY Times and the elitist Washington Post, and reported on daily by the hysterical mainstream leftist media) are not unbiased journalism.
Hillary Clinton and the foundation DO need to be thoroughly and honestly investigated, as does the Obama admin. She was SOS when she obviously appeared to have committed serious crimes that jeopardized national security. Comey said as much, before he made up an imaginary "intent" requirement that ironically was also obviously met. It has nothing to do with politics (although I have no doubt she plans to run again in 2020) - it is all about the credibility of the United States govt, the DOJ, the FBI, etc... Not to mention actually following the law, a single standard of justice for all, and not setting dangerous precedents for future bad behavior at the top levels of government.
Are we going to say from here forward that democrat administration presidents, secretaries of state, AGs, intelligence officials, etc get a free pass to do anything and everything that they want, and that we will only thoroughly investigate and prosecute top govt officials if they are Republican like Trump or are working on behalf of a GOP administration?
Comey is apparently not willing to testify behind closed doors to congress - he only wants to do so on camera, so that he can pull the "that's classified" card over and over when asked tough questions he won't want to answer. He's not the most credible guy, and is only now saying that Trump asked him not to continue investigating Flynn 3 months later - AFTER he was fired, of course. It has been rumored that Loretta Lynch visited the WH dozens or hundreds of times to discuss with Obama how to get Clinton off the hook.
RINOs like Graham and McCain have little credibility themselves. They are like a spawn of the worst of both sides of the political aisle - they are eaten up with the spinelessness, the unwillingness to fight, and the fear of the dems and the media rampant in the GOP establishment... along with the lack of any principles, the willingness to take the country more and more to the left, and grow the govt bigger and bigger of the dems.
These career political hacks on both sides of the aisle ARE a great argument in favor of term limits. Too bad we won't ever see such limits in congress and the house - they're all too self-serving.
