Passenger forcibly removed from United Airlines flight

[Gms585]

sounds like the doctor may be a scumbag, but it has nothing to do with this case. I don't care if the same doctor has already gotten an underage atheist moose addicted to drugs for sex, all that matters is ticketing policies, de-boarding policies and how this all played out in the airport and the airplane.

I better not catch him anywhere near my dogs, however.

Scumbag doctors have the BEST lawyers. So...

 

[FLEXjs]

What this guy did in the past is not relevant.....

Agreed. They can't retroactively justify their actions based on facts that were not known at the time.

 

[DungeonDweller]

Scumbag doctors have the BEST lawyers. So...

like Saul Goodman?

Agreed. They can't retroactively justify their actions based on facts that were not known at the time.

I think its an attempt at smoke & mirrors. Less reasonable people will buy into it.

 

[Snake]

Hmmm...
I'm still wondering what's wrong with drugs for sex..
Like, uh, my friend, yeah, my friend gave test c to his female friend and got a promise of a pic if her clit got bigger..
Yeah, I know I'm a loser..well, my friend is, but that's definitely not wrong..I mean like say he got a bj or more..just sayin'

 

[Snake]

It's more like gratitude!

 

[Swiper]

I don't see why they can't have a policy where if they overbook then they'll ask passengers if they would like to take another flight and also give them credit or money and start bidding up and whoever thinks it's worth it will raise her hand and take that deal and go on the next flight. there's a price for everything. when the price is right people will take the next flight and or credit / money. that seems more reasonable than just randomly picking people.

 

[BrotherIron]

Overbooking is not right but of course big business is going to do whatever it wants.

I hope the airline loses the case and they suffer for it.

 

[Big B]

I hope he wins a massive lawsuit. These big corps need a lesson. But I'm sure somewhere in the fine print states they have the right to beat the fuck out of you at their discretion.

It wasn't UA that the passenger was fighting with. It was Federal Agents. He resisted. Big trouble for him. Payback a bitch, he got his ass kicked...

 

[Big B]

I don't see why they can't have a policy where if they overbook then they'll ask passengers if they would like to take another flight and also give them credit or money and start bidding up and whoever thinks it's worth it will raise her hand and take that deal and go on the next flight. there's a price for everything. when the price is right people will take the next flight and or credit / money. that seems more reasonable than just randomly picking people.

From what I understood, he agreed at first then changed his mind. I have read he gotten off the plane and fought his way back in. Not sure if true or not, but UA did have a policy passengers must follow, fair or not. The main issue is the passenger vs. federal agents...

 

[prime]

It wasn't UA that the passenger was fighting with. It was Federal Agents. He resisted. Big trouble for him. Payback a bitch, he got his ass kicked...

He didn't do anything wrong. It's pretty apparent now united didn't take the correct measures. They didn't even raise the voucher price to the maximum limit. The contract states they can deny boarding. He was boarded already. Yes pay will be a bitch for UA. To say they did nothing wrong is not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Big B]

He didn't do anything wrong. It's pretty apparent now united didn't take the correct measures. They didn't even raise the voucher price to the maximum limit. The contract states they can deny boarding. He was boarded already. Yes pay will be a bitch for UA. To say they did nothing wrong is not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Wasn't talking about UA. Like I said, it comes down between the passenger and the federal government. He resisted. That's against the law...

 

[prime]

Wasn't talking about UA. Like I said, it comes down between the passenger and the federal government. He resisted. That's against the law...

He didn't do anything wrong. UA did not have the right to eject him. The law shouldn't have been involved. Therefore UA is responsibility. He may not have any action against the feds but he does have against UA.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk