V
Vick
MuscleHead
- Jun 13, 2012
- 897
- 146
RDA Nutritional Requirements for specific compunds.
So I got lethargic on 1g Test and went to my doctor who said I was anemic and had to take iron. Never been anemic before and always chugging my Ensures for my multis I thought I was covered. Well turns out I ended up needing what normally would have been toxic amounts of iron, let's say enough to kill a child, and then I felt fine. That got me thinking about the old days of raw eggs and dessicated liver, in the old days they also worked closely with Doctors so their blood tests probably showed them any nutritional deficiencies to address.
Well that got me thinking about the strongest compounds and the highest anabolic ratios and their sides. Well maybe their sides are just due to a nutritional deficiency. Let's take 100mg Anadrol for example, it's known to increase RBC dramatically and run in even higher doses for medicinal purposes. It also has an anabolic ratio 4 times that of testosterone, albeit not as androgenic, so if 100mg can do what 400mg test can do on paper, wouldn't common sense tell you that you also need 4 times the nutritional requirements. Now let's take it a step further and look at Halotestin which is 19 times as anabolic as testosterone on paper but no one ever experiences dramatic gains on Halo like Drol, just a lot more sides. Now what if that was because we were not meeting the nutritional requirements of Halo to begin with. Now lets go even further and say if we started cycles with low anabolic ratios and gradually increased to higher anabolic ratios and their nutritional requirements we could reap the full benefits of the stated anabolic ratios? Wouldn't it be nice not to have any sides on Tren and reap the full benefits.
So I got lethargic on 1g Test and went to my doctor who said I was anemic and had to take iron. Never been anemic before and always chugging my Ensures for my multis I thought I was covered. Well turns out I ended up needing what normally would have been toxic amounts of iron, let's say enough to kill a child, and then I felt fine. That got me thinking about the old days of raw eggs and dessicated liver, in the old days they also worked closely with Doctors so their blood tests probably showed them any nutritional deficiencies to address.
Well that got me thinking about the strongest compounds and the highest anabolic ratios and their sides. Well maybe their sides are just due to a nutritional deficiency. Let's take 100mg Anadrol for example, it's known to increase RBC dramatically and run in even higher doses for medicinal purposes. It also has an anabolic ratio 4 times that of testosterone, albeit not as androgenic, so if 100mg can do what 400mg test can do on paper, wouldn't common sense tell you that you also need 4 times the nutritional requirements. Now let's take it a step further and look at Halotestin which is 19 times as anabolic as testosterone on paper but no one ever experiences dramatic gains on Halo like Drol, just a lot more sides. Now what if that was because we were not meeting the nutritional requirements of Halo to begin with. Now lets go even further and say if we started cycles with low anabolic ratios and gradually increased to higher anabolic ratios and their nutritional requirements we could reap the full benefits of the stated anabolic ratios? Wouldn't it be nice not to have any sides on Tren and reap the full benefits.
Last edited: