Big B
Member
- Mar 28, 2017
- 55
- 11
He didn't do anything wrong. UA did not have the right to eject him. The law shouldn't have been involved. Therefore UA is responsibility. He may not have any action against the feds but he does have against UA.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
UA is a business. They have policies like any other businesses. If you don't like it, go elsewhere. Now, there are 2 diff situations there. Yes, one with UA, the other with LE. He had no right to follow his own term with the government. He resisted. Doesn't matter what caused the situation. Simple as that. Point blank.