I didn't read the article but if the author is suggesting high cholesterol is not a cause of ASCVD, he's out of his mind.
The relationship between serum cholesterol and heart disease is perfectly log-linear (at least down to cholesterols of 150 or so), with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95 in multiple studies (r2 around 0.9). Epidemiologically, heart disease mortality rises starting at about cholesterol 160 (total) or LDL about 100 in men.
Same thing with diet. You don't have to go back to the paleolithic age for proof - one simply has to look at the deleterious effects the modern diet has had in North American Indians.
There are three historical periods here, and the Inuit experience one neatly parallels the experience of the Pima indians of Arizona. The periods are:
1) Natives on Native hunter gatherer diet = health. Few saturated fats and no alcohol. Calories are hard to come by.
2) Natives lose local hunter gather diet, get put on reservations, buy Crisco and potato chips and alcohol, and start getting obese, getting diabetes, and dying like flies.
3) Government is horrified, tries to convert natives to pasta food pyramid and Mediterranean diet with tropical fruit and light salads. LOL.
4) Period 4 is failure. But I'm not sure this is the government's fault in either Canada or the US. Afterall, it hasn't worked on the non-aboriginal populations, either. European transplants to N. America are simply *slightly* more reistant to the bad effects of lots of calories, saturated fats and alcohol than the Indians, having been out of the neolithic age for a little longer. But we're dying like flies of obesity/diabetes and heart disease also. Just not *quite* so dramatically in contrast to our recent past.
The Inuit diet didn't protect from all disease, though. Eskimos eating the traditional diet famously had hemorrhagic stoke, many infection problems, some arthritis, and even some coronary disease (though not as much as these days). But obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and the general metabolic syndrome and the complications of same, no. That's from Western junk diet.
Regardless, if you can't tolerate Crestor, try to find a statin you can tolerate because the chances of lowering cholesterol and LDL with supplements or diet alone are slim. The diet needed to get LDL below *safe* levels is too strict for MOST people to adhere to. We're genetically programmed to like calories - lots of calories. Nature places more importance on the avoidance of starvation than dying of an MI at 60.
The evidence is clear: lowering cholesterol with drug therapy reduces mortality. There are more recent examples but the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study is a good one (Lancet 345:1274-1275, 1995). 4444 people with coronary disease and with cholesterols between 220 and 300, were all given dietary treatment, and then further divided more or less equally into drug treatment vs non drug treatment groups. Addition of Simvastatin to diet lowered cholesterols by 25%, MI mortality by 42%, total cardiac mortality by 35%, and total mortality by 30%. NOTHING like this has ever been done with dietary therapy.