Forum Statistics

Threads
27,648
Posts
543,028
Members
28,587
Latest Member
BluueWater_Hunter
What's New?

Russia can turn U.S. to radioactive ash: Kremlin-backed journalist

marx

marx

MuscleHead
Sep 29, 2010
4,671
626
Unfukking real. However im not surprised. He might as well sub contact our defense to a foreign country.

It is worse than that:
Report Says U.S. Military Dangerously Dependent on Foreign Suppliers | Alliance for American Manufacturing
Remaking American Security: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities & National Security Risks Across the U.S. Defense Industrial Base was authored by Guardian Six Consulting President Brigadier General John Adams and released today at a Capitol Hill event led by Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), and Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio). (Watch videos from the event.)
The report finds that U.S. national security and the health of the nation’s defense industrial base are in jeopardy because of an over-reliance on foreign suppliers for critical defense materials. Foreign sourcing puts America’s military readiness in the hands of potentially unreliable supplier nations and undermines the ability to develop capabilities needed to win on future battlefields. The report calls for action to increase domestic production of the natural resources and manufactured goods necessary to equip our military.
“America’s vulnerability today is frightening,” said General Adams. “This report is a wake-up call for America to pay attention to the growing threat posed by the steady deterioration of our defense industrial base. Excessive and unwise outsourcing of American manufacturing to other nations weakens America’s military capability. As a soldier, I’ve witnessed firsthand the importance of our nation’s ability to rapidly produce and field a sophisticated array of capabilities. There is a real risk that supply chain vulnerabilities will hamper our response to future threats.”
Examples analyzed in detail in the report include:
• The United States is completely dependent on a single Chinese company for the chemical needed to produce the solid rocket fuel used to propel HELLFIRE missiles. As current U.S. supplies diminish, our military will be reliant on the Chinese supplier to provide this critical chemical—butanetriol—in the quantities needed to maintain this missile system. HELLFIRE missiles are a widely used, reliable, and effective weapon launched from attack helicopters and unmanned drones. They are a critical component in America’s arsenal.

• The commercialization of rechargeable batteries has moved offshore along with new innovation capacity. Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are built on complex chemistries that offer supe¬rior weight savings per unit of energy density. They last a long time during disuse and are low-maintenance. Although the original invention of the Li-ion battery took place in U.S. labora¬tories housed in U.S. universities funded by the federal government, the United States is now at a competitive disadvantage, relying on foreign suppliers for both current products and next generation batteries.

• The United States imports 91 percent of the rare earth element lanthanum, which is needed to make night-vision devices, from China. This near-total dependence creates a risk that China could withhold access to lanthanum to force up the price, inhibit a U.S. technological advantage, pressure the United States to resolve disputes on terms favorable to China, or worse, completely withhold supplies. Night-vision devices give U.S. warfighters a critical advantage in low-light operations, such as the night raid that resulted in the death of Osama bin Laden.

• Production of high-tech magnets has migrated offshore, even though American research initially developed this important technology. Today, there is no domestic Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) magnet producer, and 75 percent of NdFeB magnets are fabricated in China. The disappearance of a U.S. magnet industry has eroded U.S. leadership in patents and our ability to design new applications.

President of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) Scott Paul, whose organization commissioned the report, notes that the report is call to action for a renewed focus on American manufacturing capacity.

“Allowing our defense industrial base to keep shrinking and our dependence on foreign manufactures to keep growing will make America weaker, less secure, and less safe,” Paul said. “As the U.S. pivots its defense posture to focus on Asia, procurement policies that allow, or in some cases encourage, sourcing of critical defense materials from China and other potentially unreliable suppliers don’t make sense. Self-reliance has always been an American virtue and the key to our nation’s success and prosperity. Manufacturing is important for job creation and a strong economy, and it’s also essential for our national security.”

- See more at: Report Says U.S. Military Dangerously Dependent on Foreign Suppliers | Alliance for American Manufacturing
 
chadstallion

chadstallion

Member
Aug 8, 2011
54
9
A Kremlin-backed journalist issued a stark warning to the United States about Moscow's nuclear capabilities on Sunday as the White House threatened sanctions over Crimea's referendum on union with Russia.

"Russia is the only country in the world that is realistically capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash," television presenter Dmitry Kiselyov said on his weekly current affairs show.

Behind him was a backdrop of a mushroom cloud following a nuclear blast.

Kiselyov was named by President Vladimir Putin in December as the head of a new state news agency whose task will be to portray Russia in the best possible light.

His remarks took a propaganda war over events in Ukraine to a new level as tensions rise in the East-West standoff over Crimea, a southern Ukrainian region which is now in Russian forces' hands and voted on Sunday on union with Russia.

Russian television showed images of ethnic Russians in Crimea dancing, singing and celebrating the referendum but followed them with accusations that Kiev's new authorities and the West have allowed ultra-nationalists to attack Russian-speakers in eastern Ukraine.
You never see the US say things like this. Sounds like he's scared to me.
yes, they could.
so could we.
but both countries would be the loser if that happened.
China would never let that happen; we owe them too much money and a country full of 'ash' would do them no good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n87
marx

marx

MuscleHead
Sep 29, 2010
4,671
626
Littleguy

Littleguy

TID Board Of Directors
Sep 30, 2011
4,499
3,525
A buddy of mine just left yesterday for 6 weeks at the Moscow Embassy............lol poor ****er:eek:
 
midevil

midevil

TID Board Of Directors
Jan 20, 2011
1,576
1,245
A buddy of mine just left yesterday for 6 weeks at the Moscow Embassy............lol poor ****er:eek:

After what happened in Benghazi, I hope the U.S. beefed up security at our embassies.

That reporter has his head up his ass. As soon as a nuclear strike is headed here the buttons will get pushed on our end. Both sides loose. End of story. Not much to debate.
 
J

joe1

New Member
Mar 26, 2014
9
2
A buddy of mine just left yesterday for 6 weeks at the Moscow Embassy............lol poor ****er:eek:

You're buddy is a spook I would take it? They work at embassies and consulates under diplomatic cover.
 
RAIDEN

RAIDEN

VIP Member
Feb 22, 2012
4,385
1,345
This really gets to me. It's like telling your child at school to be a bully and intimidate others in the hope that they will be scared of your kid and not hurt them.

What happens? It might work for awhile until someone is fed up and then yes, it was the bully's fault for instigating things and getting everyone's nose out of joint.
Not really. Then again your kid can be known as the weak one that everyone picks on, takes lunch money, gets pushed around, spit on, disrespected etc. Sorry but in this day and age that cant happen.

Better yet lets be soft, weak and passive, maybe some other country tries to invade us like Putin did Ukraine.
 
N

n87

Member
Apr 27, 2012
12
2
Really? What about Poland and the Czech republic? How about Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania? How about the eastern portion of Germany? .
How about Darfur and turmoil in other african countries? Are we gonna police those too?
 
graniteman

graniteman

MuscleHead
Dec 31, 2011
6,133
1,556
This really gets to me. It's like telling your child at school to be a bully and intimidate others in the hope that they will be scared of your kid and not hurt them.

What happens? It might work for awhile until someone is fed up and then yes, it was the bully's fault for instigating things and getting everyone's nose out of joint.

That's because Europeans have a different way of looking at life. Lokk at it this way..You guys think like this..'If I'm real nice to the bully he'll like me and be nice back. Said Bully smacks you in the mouth bunny ears you and takes your lunch money. You're afraid to hit the Bully back in fear of angering him and him beating you worse..
Strength Throught Peace Americans believe this. ''I'm going to be the Strongest, Best equipped Toughest looking as well as being able to back it up Guy on the school yard. Bullies will not **** with this guy . If you've ever fought a bully you know most will not take on a formidable adversary.
I don't see Russia trying to take over Chinese territory or American etc territory..he's looking for weaklings. like a wolf picking a young or old lamb out of the flock

Hence Peace Through Strength.
 
graniteman

graniteman

MuscleHead
Dec 31, 2011
6,133
1,556
How about Darfur and turmoil in other african countries? Are we gonna police those too?

We ALREADY have American Forces fighting on the African continent, have been for quite a while now.
 
graniteman

graniteman

MuscleHead
Dec 31, 2011
6,133
1,556
After what happened in Benghazi, I hope the U.S. beefed up security at our embassies.

That reporter has his head up his ass. As soon as a nuclear strike is headed here the buttons will get pushed on our end. Both sides loose. End of story. Not much to debate.

Not if you live in America, every Democrat President has signed a non retalitory strike in a nuclear attack. We will absorb the 1st strike,
 
N

n87

Member
Apr 27, 2012
12
2
I don't see Russia trying to take over Chinese territory or American etc territory..he's looking for weaklings. like a wolf picking a young or old lamb out of the flock

Hence Peace Through Strength.
Do you see US trying to send troops to Russia or China, instead of to weaklings like Iraq and Afghanistan?
The point is, no country will directly attack equally strong opponent. Too much at stake. Days of the Third Reich are long gone.
And availability of nukes serves as a major deterrent.
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 0 members watching this topic

Top