JR Ewing
MuscleHead
- Nov 9, 2012
- 1,329
- 420
You obviously didn't follow the OJ Simpson case either. There was obviously blood planted to frame OJ. Mark Fuhrman was exposed on the witness stand as a racist, and refused to answer the question if he planted OJs blood at the crime scene..
The Jury was predominately a black jury too, so lets not pull the race card and say if they jury was all white he would have been convicted. The evidence said otherwise..
Please tell me you're joking about the Simpson case. Furhman lied about using the "N-word" - he wasn't found to be "lying about planting blood". Had there been any actual evidence that he planted blood anywhere or otherwise tried to frame Simpson, he could have faced the death penalty, and would have at least been prosecuted and been looking at a very long prison sentence. There was never a shred of evidence that Simpson was framed. It was an insanely inprobable theory the defense cooked up that the jury bought into. Remember, the defense only has to raise reasonable doubt, and they convinced the jury that the cops could have possibly done such a thing. Of course as dumb as that jury was, they probably believed the entire LAPD actually DID frame a famous celebrity.
Read this book to get the real scoop from one of the best criminal attorneys (on both sides) the country has ever seen:
http://www.amazon.com/Outrage-Five-Reasons-Simpson-Murder/dp/0393330834/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1374519841&sr=1-4&keywords=outrage