N
Nate2010
Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 25
- 3
All right, we've all heard the arguments that dumbbells are superior to barbells for benching because they work more "stabilizers", allow for a greater range of motion, make sure that one side does not become unbalanced, etc. However, some people (such as myself) disagree that dumbbell benching is the way to go for everybody. Personally I'm not really buying into the idea that dumbbells force you to lift with improved technique.
For example, I hit up the gym yesterday, and I started with my usual half hour or so of squats. There was a guy next to me in another rack that was also squatting, and by the looks of it he was a serious lifter. He squatted for a long time, with more intensity than I typically see from the average gym goer. Great, I love it when I see this.
Fast forward a half hour or so. I'm finishing my training with rows and I happen to look over and see the same guy benching with dumbbells. While he was using what most would consider an acceptable range of motion with his left side, his right side stopped a little short before returning to lockout. This was consistent throughout the set, always a little short on the right side.
Now the point is not that I think dumbbell benching is worthless for everyone. I just think that it is glorified beyond its merits, especially for beginner lifters. Everyone argues that barbells allow for sloppy technique, when just yesterday I witnessed a glaringly obvious flaw in a dumbbell bencher's form. For some people dumbbells will be appropriate, but to say that it's superior to a barbell is not justified, IMO.
For example, I hit up the gym yesterday, and I started with my usual half hour or so of squats. There was a guy next to me in another rack that was also squatting, and by the looks of it he was a serious lifter. He squatted for a long time, with more intensity than I typically see from the average gym goer. Great, I love it when I see this.
Fast forward a half hour or so. I'm finishing my training with rows and I happen to look over and see the same guy benching with dumbbells. While he was using what most would consider an acceptable range of motion with his left side, his right side stopped a little short before returning to lockout. This was consistent throughout the set, always a little short on the right side.
Now the point is not that I think dumbbell benching is worthless for everyone. I just think that it is glorified beyond its merits, especially for beginner lifters. Everyone argues that barbells allow for sloppy technique, when just yesterday I witnessed a glaringly obvious flaw in a dumbbell bencher's form. For some people dumbbells will be appropriate, but to say that it's superior to a barbell is not justified, IMO.