Man Kills Officer During No Knock Search Warrant-Charged With Murder

[DLTH]

"Unreasonable search" is the phrase used in the bill or rights. A no knock warrant is unreasonable. Every warrant served is potentially dangerous. In fact every police encounter with a citizen is potentially dangerous including traffic stops. If i was on the bench my interpretation is a no knock warrant is not reasonable.

Says who, you? I mean seriously, as defined by who?

 

[DLTH]

I consider a cycle personal use.

Legally it's intent to distribute.

Law isn't reality.

You have cop friends, you're always defending asshat cops and preaching compliance.

What kind of person commits felonies but preaches compliance?

Dude you sound extremely bitter. Is there something that happened to you that we don't know, or at least that I don't know about? Where you raped by a cop or something? I mean I'm a Ron Paul kind of guy to but your view is warped but from what I don't know. Please fill me in if their was some traumatic thing that LE did to you.

 

[rezjzzor084]

69 I would have thanked your posts but Im all out!!

now i thanked for you

 

[midevil]

Look at the target before you squeeze the trigger. Simple. No room for error.

 

[SAD]

Look at the target before you squeeze the trigger. Simple. No room for error.

To be fair, the guy just woke up and saw a man rushing him (and his pregnant woman), likely dressed in all black riot/swat-type gear. I would have taken one split-second look and shot more than once.

 

[DLTH]

Look at the target before you squeeze the trigger. Simple. No room for error.

It's not that simple, you hesitate and you could be dead.

 

[MorganKane]

Highlighted below: Seems by this answer you're on their side ie: defending, trying to explain their actions.

You seem to be highly emotional to read all that into it. I'm merely pointing out cause and effect . Britains stance on firearms as well as ''free speech'' are frightening to Freedom loving Americans. It's spread to Canada as well, creeping socialism , big brother gov't. I think if you calm down and read what everyone is saying you will see it all ties together. Cause and effect

This is pretty much everyones point here, MK. No need to get angry. I'm just pointing out the ''watering down'' of the Beliefs America was Founded on , the watering down appears in votes and it effects our laws and personal freedoms. More dependent on gov't the more votes BIG gov't gets = more power over our daily lives= loss of personal freedoms

FYI, Europe is a bit bigger then Britain.
You keep coming back to them when you refer to Europe, maybe you should pick up a map and read a bit at the same time.
you will learn a few things.

I am not the one thats watering down any believes. I just continue to repeat reality, something you seem to ignore.
I did not vote in a single supreme court.

Just because you dont like how the law is being applied does not mean you right.

Based on the law the no-knock warrant was legal, does not matter how much you bitch and cry over it.
The issue with the case in this thread has absolutely nothing do with your opinion about the law, but you fail to see that.

 

[MorganKane]

Says who, you? I mean seriously, as defined by who?

Its already been defined over and over by both state and federal supreme court.
POBs opinion is irrelevant, its an already defined legal matter.

 

[MorganKane]

To be fair, the guy just woke up and saw a man rushing him (and his pregnant woman), likely dressed in all black riot/swat-type gear. I would have taken one split-second look and shot more than once.

And thats the case that will be argued in court.
I am reasonable sure that neither 69niutes nor graniteman will be consulted on the legality of a search warrant that has already been debated by the supreme court.

 

[MorganKane]

Lol, you know as bad as all that sounds 69, you're speaking truth. With all the laws plus another new 43,000 new ones this year EVERYONE at some point in the day is a criminal. Gov't looks at law abinding citizens as the problem, enemies

But this as nothing to do with this case.
I agree with you on all of this but its irrelevant to this case.

The militarization of the police is a huge and growing problem but again - nothing to do with this case.

We dont get to break laws we dont like without dealing with the consequence when we break them.

 

[DLTH]

Its already been defined over and over by both state and federal supreme court.
POBs opinion is irrelevant, its an already defined legal matter.

I know it has, I just wanted to know who/where POB was coming up with that info.

 

[DLTH]

But this as nothing to do with this case.
I agree with you on all of this but its irrelevant to this case.

The militarization of the police is a huge and growing problem but again - nothing to do with this case.

We dont get to break laws we dont like without dealing with the consequence when we break them.

It does in the sense that it has to do with the war on drugs. The war on drugs and the war on terror are what's fueling the police state we are heading into.