_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Agreed Shortz, as in many regions human overpopulation has constrained the indigenous wildlife such that controlled hunts or kills MUST be allowed. The alternative wildlife overflow into the general populous, limited animal foodstuffs from over population etc. I know that looks "gross" but rest assured that meat will be eaten by the local animals.
I get the senseless killing of a animal but senseless slaughter has been going on for DECADES there. People live in squalor and hey, TBH , if I lived in a shithole and someone told me I could get big money for some tusks..there would be a lot of tuskless elephants. It's perspective, we have it 100,000x's better than Africans
You think I'm a touchy-feely liberal because this disgusts me?
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
I must confess I don't know the conditions in which the poachers themselves live. There's no question that many Africans do live in shit holes. However, the real blame lies with those who buy the ivory, and those people most certainly don't live in squalor. The ivory trade isn't about human survival, it's about human greed.
Sometimes what we see as human greed another man see's as feeding his family. 2 countries glare, Africa and Mexico, both full of raw materials , oil etc but their corrupt govt keep these shitty living conditions to maintain power. Really limits a man's options, it's not like here in the USA where we get to choose our occupations or for that fact if we will even work.
Don't get me wrong I don't like poachers and their methods but when a man has limited choices he will do what he has to to feed himself and his family
If your belief is all mammals are of equal "value" in spite of the unequivocal world dominance by homosapiens I would disagree, but to each their own.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic