LMAO I'd probably blame the DNP too.
1-5 will provide the stimuli for muscle growth but not to the extent of higher rep work, it will instead cause more strength gains, I think that we agree on. My issue with the wording was that the muscles aren't built up by the weight they are actually damaged by the weight, they are built up by the repair process (yay nutrition). To most this is an insignificant distinction but I've met too many people that thought lifting weights is what makes you grow and think no further about what is actually happening in the body. I would have said something about maximal work being the stimulus for strength gain unlike bodybuilding where high reps are used for optimal hypertrophy.
Just curious is there any written strength training programs with partials in them? Serious question not debating I know u guys know ur stuff. And what's a static hold?
For me I work the opposite way to increase the sticking point my squat. I'll do bottom up squats or set box squats (at or below parallel) to help increase the weight lifted at the sticking point.
All this stuff works. I like static hold myself. Seems to make the whole structure stronger and seems to release some kind of governer.
Glyco big thanks for mentioning the static holds... I just got back from the gym after trying these on rack pulls. Pulled 495 and held for 10 seconds. Unbelievable mind-muscle connection. I swear I felt muscle fibers being recruited over time. Like in my traps. The contraction started at the top of em, and quickly moved down them. Awesome stuff!
For me I work the opposite way to increase the sticking point my squat. I'll do bottom up squats or set box squats (at or below parallel) to help increase the weight lifted at the sticking point.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic