The most effective means of ensuring a particular substance is effective is the maintainence of Steady State levels.
The most reliable means of ensuring steady state levels are maintained?
Dose the medication at an interval which does NOT exceed it's half life.
Ergo whether a benefit is achieved by altering the dosing interval while simultaneously increasing the dosage is certainly possible providing the concentration does NOT fall below what is known as the Steady State therapeutic level.
However essentially all enzymatic systems will change from first to zero order kinetics as the substrate concentration is increased.
What does that mean? Once a particular level is reached the responsible enzymatic process becomes SATURATED and NO further increase of substrate will occur.
The net effect of the latter is that "extra" AAS which is just sitting around waiting for the enzymatic train to offload some passengers, it's likely to be CATABOLIZED and eliminated!
So there os a point of diminishing returns for an AAS.
Best
JIM
I took it at face value, and thought it was an interesting way to end a thread that taught me quite a bit, and I hope some others got something out of it too. On a forum designed to teach, learn, and share, it shouldn't be an issue if somebody asks questions in order to learn from people who can teach and share. If I came off as bantering and bickering rather than inquisitive and curious, I apologize and you misinterpreted. But if the issue is that I ask too many questions, questions that I believe the answers for are not easily found, then I'm stumped as to how to go about participating on this forum. I'm not saying that I'm done with TID, I'm saying that I am legitimately at a loss.
By the way, I think the follow up by AllTheWay described how others probably took your post.
would this be on the lines of say too much vit c? The excess is just waste and eliminated
The most effective means of ensuring a particular substance is effective is the maintainence of Steady State levels.
The most reliable means of ensuring steady state levels are maintained?
Dose the medication at an interval which does NOT exceed it's half life.
Ergo whether a benefit is achieved by altering the dosing interval while simultaneously increasing the dosage is certainly possible providing the concentration does NOT fall below what is known as the Steady State therapeutic level.
However essentially all enzymatic systems will change from first to zero order kinetics as the substrate concentration is increased.
What does that mean? Once a particular level is reached the responsible enzymatic process becomes SATURATED and NO further increase of substrate will occur.
The net effect of the latter is that "extra" AAS which is just sitting around waiting for the enzymatic train to offload some passengers, it's likely to be CATABOLIZED and eliminated!
So there os a point of diminishing returns for an AAS.
Best
JIM
Science is cool, but I'd never take halo at 2.5mg every 4 hours if I wanted to rage on the platform. The same goes for guys who love suspension preworkout. If the point is to reach your arbitrary saturation point and stay there throughout the workout, then taking a little tiny amount every half-life-minus-x-amount-of-time doesn't really achieve that effect.
I don't know if you read through the whole thread, but I use my injectables to keep a steady supply of AAS, and my orals to peak during workouts. Again, I'm all about science, but sometimes it's just words that sound fancy, and some big meathead ignores them and is more successful because of it.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic