AeroSpaceEngineer
Member
- Sep 19, 2010
- 46
- 3
Don't pm me for a source this supplier is not affiliated with TID in any way I just wanted to share the info
This mass spec was done by a user and he asked me to post it to show what kind of raw material is being sold out there. This company is Egbert Corporation, and is represented by a woman named Selina. She insists that her company produces only 98% pure material and offered a COA as proof. A COA is useless. It is a piece of paper that says the material has been tested and the person in charge is certifying it as such. When presented with findings she said they were not scientific and could not be accurate, which if anyone follows our mass specs they know that that is what they ALL say, without exception when the test is not to their liking. However she could not produce any mass spec that proves her claim of purity.
So this mass spec is for Test E, and came back at 71%, not a bad number by any means but a far cry from 98%. This is certainly no indicator of anything else they carry, it might all be 99%! But history has taught me that dishonesty or "mistakenness" runs deep once started. I think that if there are sources or users that use this supplier they need to understand that what they are getting may not be what they are being promised. Buyer beware is always the best policy. Know who you're buying from and what's in it. If in doubt, just buy from one of the proven sources on this fine site.
Thanks for looking and stay safe.
This mass spec was done by a user and he asked me to post it to show what kind of raw material is being sold out there. This company is Egbert Corporation, and is represented by a woman named Selina. She insists that her company produces only 98% pure material and offered a COA as proof. A COA is useless. It is a piece of paper that says the material has been tested and the person in charge is certifying it as such. When presented with findings she said they were not scientific and could not be accurate, which if anyone follows our mass specs they know that that is what they ALL say, without exception when the test is not to their liking. However she could not produce any mass spec that proves her claim of purity.
So this mass spec is for Test E, and came back at 71%, not a bad number by any means but a far cry from 98%. This is certainly no indicator of anything else they carry, it might all be 99%! But history has taught me that dishonesty or "mistakenness" runs deep once started. I think that if there are sources or users that use this supplier they need to understand that what they are getting may not be what they are being promised. Buyer beware is always the best policy. Know who you're buying from and what's in it. If in doubt, just buy from one of the proven sources on this fine site.
Thanks for looking and stay safe.