shan
TID Lady Member
- Jul 1, 2011
- 980
- 85
I found a research study designed to see how hydration affected different methods of body composition analysis, it compared hydrostatic weighing (HW in the results), air displacement via bodpod (ADP) and skinfold (SK)
here is a portion of the results, I will include a link to the paper at the bottom.
hydration status (N 66).
Hydrated Dehydrated
Weight (kg) 76.7 13.1 74.7 12.9*
%BF HW 11.3 4.8 11.1 4.7
%BFADP 11.0 5.3 10.1 5.1*
%BFSK 12.4 4.8† 12.2 4.5‡
FFMHW (kg) 67.7 10.1 66.1 10.0*
FFMADP (kg) 67.9 9.7 66.8 9.7*
FFMSK (kg) 66.9 10.5 65.4 10.3*
Values are expressed as mean SD.
* Significantly different from the hydrated state (P 0.001) (multiple pairedsample
t-tests with Bonferroni’s adjustment).
† Significantly different from the corresponding body composition variables by
HW within the hydrated state and dehydrated state (‡) (P 0.05) (repeatedmeasures
one-way ANOVA, with Dunnett multiple comparison procedure).
‡ Significantly different from the corresponding body composition variables by
HW within the dehydrated state (P 0.05) (repeated-measures one-way ANOVA,
with Dunnett multiple comparison procedure).
Db, body density; %BF, percent body fat; FFM, fat-free mass; HW, hydrostatic
weighing; ADP, air displacement plethysmography; SK, skinfolds.
TABLE 1. Subject characteristics (N 66).
Age (yr) 20.2 2.0
Height (m) 1.73 0.08
Weight (kg) 77.1 13.2
Wrestling experience (yr) 9.0 1.1
Values are expressed as mean SD.
502 Official
http://wweb.uta.edu/faculty/ricard/...ed Measures ANOVA/Repeated Measures ANOVA.pdf
here is a portion of the results, I will include a link to the paper at the bottom.
hydration status (N 66).
Hydrated Dehydrated
Weight (kg) 76.7 13.1 74.7 12.9*
%BF HW 11.3 4.8 11.1 4.7
%BFADP 11.0 5.3 10.1 5.1*
%BFSK 12.4 4.8† 12.2 4.5‡
FFMHW (kg) 67.7 10.1 66.1 10.0*
FFMADP (kg) 67.9 9.7 66.8 9.7*
FFMSK (kg) 66.9 10.5 65.4 10.3*
Values are expressed as mean SD.
* Significantly different from the hydrated state (P 0.001) (multiple pairedsample
t-tests with Bonferroni’s adjustment).
† Significantly different from the corresponding body composition variables by
HW within the hydrated state and dehydrated state (‡) (P 0.05) (repeatedmeasures
one-way ANOVA, with Dunnett multiple comparison procedure).
‡ Significantly different from the corresponding body composition variables by
HW within the dehydrated state (P 0.05) (repeated-measures one-way ANOVA,
with Dunnett multiple comparison procedure).
Db, body density; %BF, percent body fat; FFM, fat-free mass; HW, hydrostatic
weighing; ADP, air displacement plethysmography; SK, skinfolds.
TABLE 1. Subject characteristics (N 66).
Age (yr) 20.2 2.0
Height (m) 1.73 0.08
Weight (kg) 77.1 13.2
Wrestling experience (yr) 9.0 1.1
Values are expressed as mean SD.
502 Official
http://wweb.uta.edu/faculty/ricard/...ed Measures ANOVA/Repeated Measures ANOVA.pdf