ChrisLindsay9
MuscleHead
- Jun 17, 2013
- 2,773
- 1,144
Here's an article about the deadlift, "Deadlift's Dirty Little Secret" that is somewhat interesting (despite the stupid title). But T-nation really needs to stop using the "dirty little secret" in its titles. It's played out.
Anyways, I bring it up because it was referenced by someone at my gym about a conversation regarding deadlifting and powerlifting competitions. He's an older guy who used to compete, and he made the argument that the deadlift is unlike the squat and bench because the repetition isn't a "fair" lift - due to the fact that the starting point of the lift is fixed (approximately 8.75" off the floor) that doesn't take into account body type. When you bench and squat, your starting point is going to be based on your body type (your arms and chest in bench, your back and legs in squat). But the deadlift is always starting 8.75" off the floor - no matter if you're 5'0" or 6"0".
He admits that body type will produce certain advantages and disadvantages, but some of those can be resolved through training - such as how some people are going to build arches for bench, improve hip mobility to enhance leg drive, widen or shorten their hand grip; and there's high-bar and low-bar squatters, variances in stance, etc. But, he argued, those things can be learned through training in regard to their body type and mechanics.
But with powerlifting, the fixed starting position of the deadlift creates an unfairness that's built into the rules itself. No amount of training will allow you to change the fact that your rep's start is always going to be 8.75" off the floor.
Curious if anyone has any thoughts/opinions? I don't think he's saying that deadlift needs to be eliminated, but he thought it was just pointing out the inconsistency.
Does Sumo style pulling help to minimize the disadvantages, or make it more fair?
Anyways, I bring it up because it was referenced by someone at my gym about a conversation regarding deadlifting and powerlifting competitions. He's an older guy who used to compete, and he made the argument that the deadlift is unlike the squat and bench because the repetition isn't a "fair" lift - due to the fact that the starting point of the lift is fixed (approximately 8.75" off the floor) that doesn't take into account body type. When you bench and squat, your starting point is going to be based on your body type (your arms and chest in bench, your back and legs in squat). But the deadlift is always starting 8.75" off the floor - no matter if you're 5'0" or 6"0".
He admits that body type will produce certain advantages and disadvantages, but some of those can be resolved through training - such as how some people are going to build arches for bench, improve hip mobility to enhance leg drive, widen or shorten their hand grip; and there's high-bar and low-bar squatters, variances in stance, etc. But, he argued, those things can be learned through training in regard to their body type and mechanics.
But with powerlifting, the fixed starting position of the deadlift creates an unfairness that's built into the rules itself. No amount of training will allow you to change the fact that your rep's start is always going to be 8.75" off the floor.
Curious if anyone has any thoughts/opinions? I don't think he's saying that deadlift needs to be eliminated, but he thought it was just pointing out the inconsistency.
Does Sumo style pulling help to minimize the disadvantages, or make it more fair?