Latest posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
27,642
Posts
542,836
Members
28,583
Latest Member
jacobss
What's New?

Aerial Photo Shows 9/11 Towers Exploded Out, Did Not Collapse Down

S

southernhound

Member
Mar 3, 2013
63
2
FROM:
http://911explained.blogspot.com/2013/03/aerial-photo-shows-911-towers-exploded.html

Aerial view of WTC complex taken on September 23, 2001, before clean-up operations had begun. For photo with clickable areas of detail go to:Image at: http://busharchives.org/911/wtc.html

wtcmedium.jpg



Close up of steel debris
8183941980_45ba8ae7a3_z.jpg



One of the first things Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who coordinated the destruction of the steel evidence at Ground Zero, did after the attack was prohibit almost all photography at the site. Police and FBI agents were ordered to confiscate cameras on the spot, although inevitably, there were simply too many people swarming the crime scene for such a stricture to be successfully enforced.


One key piece of photographic evidence that did survive the government's attempts to keep the public in the dark about what happened that day was an aerial photo taken on Sept. 23, 2001, long before major clean-up operations had begun. Rescue workers and firefighters were still primarily concerned with searching for human remains and even long-shot survivors. The clash between police and firefighters which took place as Giuliani hastened to the "scoop and dump" phase of the operation was Nov. 2.


The aerial photo shows what no other photo could in such clear and convincing detail: that the towers did not collapse down through the line of gravity, but were blown outwards in all directions for two or three times as far as the towers were wide, leaving a carpet of cleanly-cut steel beams and perimeter wall sections across the entire WTC complex. No force imaginable in a downward gravitational collapse can explain the lateral ejection of steel sections with the weight of bulldozers for up to two football fields, at clocked speeds of up to 70 MPH.


As can be seen in the aerial photo, the steel beam pieces are mostly straight as arrows, un-deformed by heat, and cut neatly at the ends. The steel beams do not wind up in a mound, as one would expect, with the center of the tower's bases as the high point, but rather scattered uniformly across the entire World Trade Center complex, which consisted of seven buildings. Perimeter sections, which consisted of 15-inch wide beam assemblies covered with aluminum cladding, can be seen lying thickly across WTC 6, nearly two football fields away. Each one of these pieces weighed up to 20 or more tons.


The official NIST report explained dust ejections (what are obviously demolition squibs) by saying "compressed air" forced the dust out of breaking windows. But no amount of compressed air can lift 20-ton steel assemblies and hurl them laterally for 400 feet, at 50 to 70 MPH.


Hence the reason for Giuliani's ban on photography at Ground Zero. No amount of instruction in physics or fire temperature calculations would be as dangerous to the official "collapse" theory as plain visual evidence of demolition. One need only to believe what your eyes are telling you . Steel falls down, not outward for 200 feet and more, at speeds of up to 80 MPH.


The below video narrated by David Chandler gives one of the best views of cut steel beam shooting upwards and outwards, not falling down through the line of gravity. Keeping in mind the massive scale of the towers (nearly a football field wide,) it must be remembered that what seem like tiny sticks are 10 foot long pieces of two-foot wide steel beam and larger, of which even the smallest would weigh nearly one ton.




Here is another view of multi-ton pieces of cut steel beams spinning away from the building as if they were toothpicks.



Circled sections of steel beam are approximately 10 feet long, the height of one story



This rarely seen photo shows the width of the debris field and lateral ejections of steel and pulverized concrete debris, which can be explained only by high explosives.





From lower right-hand corner of above aerial map, leaning against outer edge of WTC 4
wtc4periman.jpg



From roof of WTC 4, massive perimeter wall sections, see 60-foot flatbed trucks at bottom for idea of scale.
wtc4close2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rfagazzi

Rfagazzi

MuscleHead
Mar 15, 2012
808
109
Very interesting pics. Still very sad. Many people are not aware of this, but alot of the larger companies offered free daycare in those very buildings. God bless all those effected. Sorry to go off track.
 
J-dub

J-dub

MuscleHead
Feb 16, 2013
1,171
178
Are you here to just post every conspiracy theory on the internet or actual talk about maybe, just maybe lifting some weights?

Thank You! I was wondering what the **** was going on with all this shit
 
BD Cool

BD Cool

VIP Member
Dec 1, 2011
1,367
713
I love a good conspiracy theory but I just can't get into this one... just seems too far fetched.
 
Rein

Rein

MuscleHead
Sep 10, 2010
1,241
128
This is no conspiracy theory. It's the truth. There's so much evidence out there available for research that I am stunned people still believe that it actually was a "terrorist" attack. It was just the perfect excuse to invade Iraq so that American government can put it's hand on their oil.
 
Lizard King

Lizard King

Administrator
Staff Member
Sep 9, 2010
14,551
8,028
This is no conspiracy theory. It's the truth. There's so much evidence out there available for research that I am stunned people still believe that it actually was a "terrorist" attack. It was just the perfect excuse to invade Iraq so that American government can put it's hand on their oil.

Yes, we have seen what that has done for the price of oil and gasoline since the invasion. Would you like me to make a line graph with the exponential increase, lol
 
tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
6,337
5,061
This is no conspiracy theory. It's the truth. There's so much evidence out there available for research that I am stunned people still believe that it actually was a "terrorist" attack. It was just the perfect excuse to invade Iraq so that American government can put it's hand on their oil.

I don't believe this for a minute. There was not a single Iraqi on those planes, to say 9/11 was a pretext for invading Iraq is just silly. Tel me Rein, we went into Iraq and kicked the shit out of the Republican Guard, routed Al Qaeda our of Anbar, and what oil fields did the Americans take over? Name the oil fields we appropriated. If that was blood for oil, we did a pretty sucky job of it...

Everybody wants to believe a conspiracy theory.
 
PillarofBalance

PillarofBalance

Strength Pimp
Feb 27, 2011
17,066
4,640
I'm so ****ing sick of these WTC conspiracy posts... Seriously OP, why are you here?
 
J-dub

J-dub

MuscleHead
Feb 16, 2013
1,171
178
This is no conspiracy theory. It's the truth. There's so much evidence out there available for research that I am stunned people still believe that it actually was a "terrorist" attack. It was just the perfect excuse to invade Iraq so that American government can put it's hand on their oil.

You are so easily fooled brother
 
Spongy

Spongy

Member
Mar 18, 2012
99
18
Engineering 101 will debunk this "proof" OP, I suggest you enroll in a course at your local community college. As weight collapses from the top, it blows the lower portion of the building out. Simple. If you want to believe in conspiracy theories that's fine, I'm not going to tell you not to. Just get me something convincing, not something a first year engineering student could debunk.

Rein, this is not to blast that you believe it was falsified, that's you're right. I just think the OPs "proof" is easily debunked.
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 0 members watching this topic

Top