Latest posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
27,647
Posts
543,007
Members
28,586
Latest Member
SDUBUBLACK
What's New?

Letter to Diane Feinstein from a U.S. Marine

YAMAHA147

YAMAHA147

MuscleHead
Feb 23, 2012
1,092
89
Senator Dianne Feinstein,


I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not
believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think
it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a
group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a
crime.


You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine
Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims
the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have
one.


I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your
servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the
flesh and blood of America.


I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am
an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic
AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.


I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the
media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.


We, the people, deserve better than you.


Respectfully Submitted,

Joshua Boston

Cpl, United States Marine Corps

2004-2012
 
RAIDEN

RAIDEN

VIP Member
Feb 22, 2012
4,385
1,345
Spot on. Dianne Fuckstein is a piece of shit who lives in a glass bubble that is disconnected from reality.
 
P

prime

TID Board Of Directors
Dec 31, 2011
1,178
254
They don't actually believe bans that it will stop crime. The real goal is to eliminate the 2nd amendment. But they need the gun haters and gun fearing moms to unwittingly go along with their plan by taking advantage of tragic events and blaming inanimate objects.

Banning guns which is a passive stance will probably stop 0% of the future tragic events. Armed guards at schools, which is an active solution, would probably stop or minimize 99% of future school shootings. Yet they argue that is a ridiculous solution because it brings more guns to school and guns in schools kill children. It's a circular argument that they just refuse to listen. Even inner schools that have armed guards claim that it lowers incidents but it goes on deaf ears because it doesn't follow the agenda of dismantling of the 2nd amendment. It's grim.

I seriously think they want more events to happen after they so call "ban" something so they can continue to ban more and more weapons.
 
Last edited:
BigGameHunter

BigGameHunter

VIP Member
Jun 26, 2012
475
192
Great points by all of you. Respect to the Soldier that put her in her place.
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 0 members watching this topic

Top