JR Ewing
MuscleHead
- Nov 9, 2012
- 1,329
- 420
No, thats not it.
Net neutrality just means that an ISP cant restrict its bandwidth to end points based on content.
It isnt about slowing it down but controlling that bandwidth.
if we let every ISP restrict where we could surf, what we could read and what kind of traffic we can pass then we are fcked.
I dont trust the government much but in this case I trust the ISPs less.
They have already tried to mess with net neutrality.
We have been enjoying net neutrality since the internet became common usage, I really dont want to see it change.
Pretty much the civilized world has figured this out, I dont see no reason we dont want to do the same.
Next step is to control the power of the FCC.
Good luck with restricting or taking away any power from anyone in government or connected to government once it's been assumed. I think the power of the pen and the phone and the president and those who pull his strings is what we need to worry more about. I believe they were the ones who have pushed the FCC and other government agencies into doing these things.
Why would an ISP restrict things not illegal, other than to charge money / more money for certain things? I would think the government would be the one we would need to worry about restricting things like free speech.