gunslinger
VIP Member
- Sep 19, 2010
- 2,051
- 1,297
I don't completely disagree but I also think we do them a greater disservice by telling them a calorie is a calorie. This is why so many are still on the SAD (standard American diet) and doing stupid shit like eating massive amounts or carbs and sugar and having a diet coke and wondering why they get fatter by the day. Also, it amazing me that people will completely shit on something they have never personally tried just based on the pseudoscience they read in college. People are willing to take all manner of dangerous drugs in order to lose a few pounds but are scared to death to eat steak and eggs. WTF?!?I find these conversations tiring as we retread the same issue. IF our bodies were a static system then CICO would be paramount. Few people honestly believe that. But they use CICO out to simplify things for newbies that get overwhelmed at the beginning of a diet.
there is value in simplicity when getttstarted. Then we learn that our bodies adapt. We all intrinsically know this as we see it all the time.
I don’t think we help people by telling them they can gain weight on 1000 calories and lose weight on 5000 calories. It confuses them and they throw their hands up in the air and think it’s hopeless.
Let a newbie get a few small wins under their belt to encourage them. In 6-8 weeks their body will start adapting and then you can begin educating them on how we’re adaptive systems and it will begin to make more sense
Once they have "learned" the wrong way its almost impossible to teach them the correct way. Case examples all over including this board.