I do agree with several of your points TB. I do think that significant tariffs, particularly in the short to medium term will result in slight increases the prices of various goods. Some more than others, as might be expected. At the same time, every company presently importing some or all of their product now have a different calculus in deciding where to manufacture. The U.S. will become a better place to manufacture, as the tariffs in place now make the playing field more even.
What I'm not sure I agree about is the strategy Trump employed in implementing the tariffs. I will agree with you that the method he used was a dizzying, frenetic, shock and awe implementation. Was that intentional or just a byproduct of the trade people not being ready? I don't know for sure. But what did, in fact, happen?
When Trump got into office around 1/20, he clearly indicated that 4/2 was liberation day (or whatever he called it), and told the whole world what he was going to do. Did anyone pay much attention? Not really. A few countries said, "let's initiate trade talks." Just like the old days. Let's meet in some swank locale, drink good wine, eat good food, and talk and talk and talk. When nothing happens, they can say we're in negotiations. That can and will go on forever. Instead, Trump drops the hammer, and all those smug EU wankers and like "holy shit" this guy is nuts. Between 4/2 and 6/30 we saw a lot more earnest negotiations didn't we?
I hate to say it. But Trump's style works. He knows where he has leverage and he's not afraid to use it when he thinks it's important. He's happy to talk, but gets tired of talk, talk, talk when he perceives it's just BS delay. In those instances, he lights a fire, and surprise, surprise, things get done.
I think the Dems have been talking about this type of trade strategy for 40 years, but never pulled the trigger. Trump, previously a Dem, has been talking about this since around 1990, and he's doing it. So the experiment is being implemented, and we shall see over the next several years how this plays out. We know how the previous trade regime worked. Other countries screwed us (i.e., not fair trade). So I'm willing to see where this goes.
It is disruptive, no doubt. But if the present framework is broken, maybe disruptive is the right thing.