R
rg4
New Member
- Feb 5, 2013
- 5
- 0
Wondering about cycle experience for this athlete. Not having that information I would still ditch the test in favor of primo ace or NPP. And at about 1/2 that dosage. I have to say at her height at 156 19% she needs to loose aprox 21 lbs of fat/water to hit 5%. That puts her at 134 if she doesn't loose an ounce of muscle although I bet her stage weight will be even lighter. This is the only reason I even agree to use a compound other then var or winny. 16 weeks is not a lot of time.
Enlighten me. Why?
B/c of the weight gain even with a dialed in diet, the sides she'd exp, etc. You'd def not want to use it for cutting either. There are better choices for women.
If you want the whole endo in depth answer you should ask SS. I can ask her to pop on and give an in depth explanation.
I agree that it will be a bit watery but nothing like a long ester. She's going to drop it at 9 weeks so I don't think its a factor. She was prepared to take test prop and I feel NPP is a better choice. Still primo ace even better. I do agree with everyone that she needs to watch the sides.
And indeed bring in another opinion.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic