Latest posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
29,040
Posts
573,746
Members
29,048
Latest Member
MostJackedAttorneyInNYC

COA BPC-157

tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
7,743
7,882
Received the lab report on the BPC-157 today, which is attached. Bottom line is it's what they say it is, it's very pure, but it's underdosed by 5%.

Identity: BPC-157
Quantity: 4.75mg
Purity: 99.78%
 

Attachments

  • BPC157 COA.pdf
    321 KB · Views: 6
jhotsauce7

jhotsauce7

TID Board Of Directors
Jan 18, 2011
3,021
944
Intetesting. Curious to know if there a standard deviation mentioned anywhere for purity and sample assay.
5% isn’t the end of the world but It will be telling to see if other samples sent are also 5% short. Or if there is general inconsistency
 
tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
7,743
7,882
Intetesting. Curious to know if there a standard deviation mentioned anywhere for purity and sample assay.
5% isn’t the end of the world but It will be telling to see if other samples sent are also 5% short. Or if there is general inconsistency
Not sure how a standard deviation would come into play here on a single vial sample. If they tested "n" vials, then you'd have an average quantity, as well as a mean and a standard deviation.
 
jhotsauce7

jhotsauce7

TID Board Of Directors
Jan 18, 2011
3,021
944
Not sure how a standard deviation would come into play here on a single vial sample. If they tested "n" vials, then you'd have an average quantity, as well as a mean and a standard deviation.
I guess i didn’t word that right.
It is my understanding that there can be variance in measurement due to the inherent stochastic nature of peptide fragmentation as well as the numerous technical and biological factors.

so +\-5% could be a resulting from under dosing or from the lab conducting the analysis itself.

just playing devils advocate, slow day at the office. Thanks again for doing the footwork and getting these sent out. You’re the man.
 
Last edited:
gunslinger

gunslinger

VIP Member
Sep 19, 2010
2,051
1,297
I mean... at those prices you are still getting a massive amount of product even if slightly underdosed. Instead of injecting .5 just up it to .7 problem solved. So you would still be getting around 47mg for 10 vials and are paying what most companies are asking per vial. Imagine test thats 5% underdosed but $4 per bottle.
 
tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
7,743
7,882
I'm impressed with the purity. Should be getting results for the SS-31 tomorrow. I sent RUI's GH out to a different lab on Monday, and I should get confirmation of their receipt tomorrow, and expect a test result the week after Thanksgiving.
 
gunslinger

gunslinger

VIP Member
Sep 19, 2010
2,051
1,297
I have some of their tirzepatide coming for my wife and daughters. If things go smoothly I'll likely stock up on their BPC-157 and TB-500
 
tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
7,743
7,882
I guess i didn’t word that right.
It is my understanding that there can be variance in measurement due to the inherent stochastic nature of peptide fragmentation as well as the numerous technical and biological factors.

so +\-5% could be a resulting from under dosing or from the lab conducting the analysis itself.

just playing devils advocate, slow day at the office. Thanks again for doing the footwork and getting these sent out. You’re the man.
I learn something new every day!
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 15 members watching this topic

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Top