Epstein

[Yano]

Gender affirming care is the FASTEST way to legal gear there is.

No im not talking about kids , i mean the rainbow folks.

If they can't stop BillyBob from blasting estrogen to feel pretty and it's legal and available ,, they can't stop a man from blasting test to feel more like a man.

Too bad more folks don't realize that.

A little support for the rainbow folks and we might be able to buy Test at Walgreens over the counter eventually.

 

[Yano]

not true. there is no evidence that Trump or any member of his administration has engaged in sexual activity with a minor. There has been, however, an extraordinary amount of Trump's political opposition that have insinuated that. Just saying it over and over does not make it true.

Ok so he hasnt been caught with his dick in a child but dude ,,, look at the creeps freaks and fuck ups he spent his life with. You cant tell me he's not one of them ,, talking about dating his own daughter and her body like a fucking chomo.

Trumps a baby raper , plain and simple , he just hasnt been convicted yet. Sometimes when something smells like shit , looks like shit and runs like shit , you don't need to taste it for verification.

 

[testboner]

Part of me hopes every Trumpie gets to experience having a child or grandchild someday who experiences some type of identity issue. It will soften you a bit.

Nobody is arguing for chopping off little Johny's penis and calling him Sally. But for Christ's sake, do all Trumpies have to be such callous, hateful pieces of shit with closed minds??

Highly relatable FT.

 

[testboner]

not true. there is no evidence that Trump or any member of his administration has engaged in sexual activity with a minor. There has been, however, an extraordinary amount of Trump's political opposition that have insinuated that. Just saying it over and over does not make it true.

There is a SHIT TON of (overwhelming) probable cause. And there is allegation evidence that vanished - in fact, it can’t even be verified as to whether the “Jane Doe” complainant survived after going silent. What is fact however os that her claims were officially made under penalty of perjury, and yet there were no charges It’s disingenuous to matter of fact completely disregard her case as having no possibility of fact whatsoever. I’d have been scared, you would have been scared as well in her shoes.

 

[fasttwitch]

not true. there is no evidence that Trump or any member of his administration has engaged in sexual activity with a minor. There has been, however, an extraordinary amount of Trump's political opposition that have insinuated that. Just saying it over and over does not make it true.

In.Ter.Est.Ing.

Because isn't Bill Clinton and Bill Gates in the same boat? Same allegations, rumors and conjecture? Hmmmmm... Haven't Trumpies insinuated for years that Clinton and Gates are also pedos? Yes. Yes indeed.

Seems like when the allegations are aimed at Trump the allegations are suddenly invalid. When the allegations are aimed at political opponents they are valid! Funny how that works!

The majority of Americans know the truth. They are all guilty.

.

 

[MorganKane]

Also,

not true. there is no evidence that Trump or any member of his administration has engaged in sexual activity with a minor. There has been, however, an extraordinary amount of Trump's political opposition that have insinuated that. Just saying it over and over does not make it true.

So how do you explain all the lies from Trump and the administration?
Is it incompetence?
Is it a cover up?
Seriously, its time for you to demand some answer instead of defending this shit.

 

[tommyguns2]

In.Ter.Est.Ing.

Because isn't Bill Clinton and Bill Gates in the same boat? Same allegations, rumors and conjecture? Hmmmmm... Haven't Trumpies insinuated for years that Clinton and Gates are also pedos? Yes. Yes indeed.

Seems like when the allegations are aimed at Trump the allegations are suddenly invalid. When the allegations are aimed at political opponents they are valid! Funny how that works!

The majority of Americans know the truth. They are all guilty.

.

I've got no problems with the Epstein files being released. But saying that their lack of release can ONLY mean that Trump is a pedo is not true. Biden didn't release the files, and despite numerous pics of him sniffing young girls, and showering with his daughter at an inappropriate age, the media never insinuated that he was a pedo. He's just a creepy old man.

 

[tommyguns2]

There is a SHIT TON of (overwhelming) probable cause. And there is allegation evidence that vanished - in fact, it can’t even be verified as to whether the “Jane Doe” complainant survived after going silent. What is fact however os that her claims were officially made under penalty of perjury, and yet there were no charges It’s disingenuous to matter of fact completely disregard her case as having no possibility of fact whatsoever. I’d have been scared, you would have been scared as well in her shoes. View attachment 17143

This lawsuit was filed in April 2016, during the Trump I campaign. I'm sure it was only filed after Trump failed to pay this accuser hush money (after all, after he paid any hush money, the accusations would be leaked anyways). Trump said, "OK, let's go to trial, and I'll counterclaim defamation." After looking down the barrel of depositions, examination, cross-examination, she dropped her suit.

Anyone can file a lawsuit, claim just about anything. This proves absolutely nothing.

 

[Wizbang]

This lawsuit was filed in April 2016, during the Trump I campaign. I'm sure it was only filed after Trump failed to pay this accuser hush money (after all, after he paid any hush money, the accusations would be leaked anyways). Trump said, "OK, let's go to trial, and I'll counterclaim defamation." After looking down the barrel of depositions, examination, cross-examination, she dropped her suit.

Anyone can file a lawsuit, claim just about anything. This proves absolutely nothing.

to flip that to another perspective, an unlimitedly rich and powerful person with resources enough to bury anyone who would oppose them threatened to do just that to a person making a claim against them.

 

[testboner]

This lawsuit was filed in April 2016, during the Trump I campaign. I'm sure it was only filed after Trump failed to pay this accuser hush money (after all, after he paid any hush money, the accusations would be leaked anyways). Trump said, "OK, let's go to trial, and I'll counterclaim defamation." After looking down the barrel of depositions, examination, cross-examination, she dropped her suit.

Anyone can file a lawsuit, claim just about anything. This proves absolutely nothing.

TG,
To the extent her claims were made - she faced formal risk of perjury — simply filing the claims risked perjury regardless that the case did not proceed to court. She suffered no ramifications, indicating her claims could not be countered / proven false. Had she filed falsely she would have been legally attacked to the fullest extent.
There is at least to the same potential of your imagined outcome, the likelihood that she was in fact given a “Big Beautiful Bundle” to agree to a life of financial abundance in silence.

 

[testboner]

This lawsuit was filed in April 2016, during the Trump I campaign. I'm sure it was only filed after Trump failed to pay this accuser hush money (after all, after he paid any hush money, the accusations would be leaked anyways). Trump said, "OK, let's go to trial, and I'll counterclaim defamation." After looking down the barrel of depositions, examination, cross-examination, she dropped her suit.

Anyone can file a lawsuit, claim just about anything. This proves absolutely nothing.

And her complaints were filed 3x.

• April 2016, in federal court in California under the name Katie Johnson. That suit was dismissed due to procedural issues (invalid address, etc.) Heavy SportsThe IndependentWikipedia.
• June 2016, refiled in New York under the pseudonym Jane Doe The GuardianWikipediaWikipedia.
• September 30, 2016, filed again in New York as an amended Jane Doe suit with new witness declarations

 

[testboner]

This lawsuit was filed in April 2016, during the Trump I campaign. I'm sure it was only filed after Trump failed to pay this accuser hush money (after all, after he paid any hush money, the accusations would be leaked anyways). Trump said, "OK, let's go to trial, and I'll counterclaim defamation." After looking down the barrel of depositions, examination, cross-examination, she dropped her suit.

Anyone can file a lawsuit, claim just about anything. This proves absolutely nothing.

Since she signed sworn declarations even though it didn’t go to court, if they were deemed false she would still have been in violation of law because she swore her statements of events were true, correct?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, exactly — even if a case doesn’t go to trial, a person who submits a sworn declaration under penalty of perjurycan still face legal consequences if that declaration is proven to be knowingly false.

Here's how that works under the law:

• Federal law (28 U.S.C. § 1746) allows individuals to submit unsworn declarations in place of affidavits if they include a specific statement that they declare the contents are true under penalty of perjury.
• If someone knowingly lies in one of those declarations, it's a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (perjury) or § 1001(false statements), both of which are federal crimes.

So even if:

• The lawsuit was dismissed voluntarily,
• The case never went to trial, and
• The individual never testified in court,

— the sworn declaration remains a legal statement, and making false statements in it could be prosecuted if the government chose to pursue it and could prove intent to deceive.

However, this kind of prosecution is rare and typically only happens when:

• There's strong evidence the person knowingly lied, and
• The false statement had significant legal or public consequences.

In the case of "Jane Doe" vs. Trump and Epstein:

• No such perjury charges were filed.
• The case was dropped before any formal legal challenge to the truthfulness of the claims occurred.
• The identity of "Jane Doe" was never publicly confirmed, and she never gave a public interview or deposition.