All the other stuff is important but without great genetics you might get a bit bigger and a bit stronger but you aint gonna be competing.
Genetics,drugs,training/nutrition in that order.i bet that most of the people in the iron den train harder than most pros but what separate us is genetics and response to gear.lets take phil Heath.genetic freak.never seen a hyper responder to gear.without the gear his 198 pound beach body physic with the gear well the rest is history.i have been around pros in the 90s along with some big ass gym rats and honestly it comes down to genetic response to gear.
1bigun11 said:I basically agree with this statement. And I agree that gear, even in massive amounts, will not make up for bad genetics. I would simply add that genetics sets a range potential, not an either or, and that without drive and hard work and the other factors you will never know how far you can go. Which for me is another way of saying that having genetic potential is essential, but that genetic potential alone is not everything.
I would also agree that if all other factors are equal, the competitor with the best genetics will win. On the other hand, as between competitors with essentially equal genetics, work ethic and the other factors will determine the winne
Genetics is not everything. To be a world champion you also need determination, guts, perseverance, and a host of other psychological factors. You need luck. You need a lifestyle that is conducive to bodybuilding. You need knowledge of nutrition and the willpower to apply it. You need to know how to train, what your body responds to, and the intestinal fortitude to do it. Mostly you need to love it with a deep and burning passion.
We have all seen genetic freaks who are gifted enough to be champions but who train like pussies and lack the mental toughness and other attributes necessary to ever get there.
Good genetics plus mental toughness and the other championship attributes will beat great genetics alone.
Genetics is a necessary ingredient. But it is not alone sufficient. And therefore, genetics is not everything.
Aside from Ronie Colmen and Dorain Yates, most top tier guys with the genetics, I see training in videos, have abisimal form - like quarter range movements and body rocking. So if it wasn't for their genetics and ten lbs of gear each month they would likely not be much bigger than me. Which isn't very large by body building standards.
The problem with that attitude is that you are defeated before you ever get going. Whenever you see someone bigger than you, your excuse for your own lack of size is going to be that they just have better genetics and use more gear. It is like the fat person who would rather complain about his gland problem than go on a diet. Rather than whining about crappy genetics, why not try some partial reps and burns and do some cheating movements to mix things up. You will find that kind of training is freaking intense.
Of course if you grew from that type of intense training then you would run the risk that someone smaller than you would say that you owe all of your size to your superior genetics and massive drug usage. Oh well.....
I find it odd that Rich is saying genetics are everything & his muscles look like breast implants.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic