Op also said he has shoulder pain. Agreed otherwise.
I saw a vid from a sports doc that treats pro athletes and he suggested not using ice but instead heat and an estim unit. I thought it was a novel idea.
Draw blood in with nutrients and healing stuff and work out the debris thru the lymphatic system with the estim.
I haven't had a serious sprain to treat (knock on wood) so I don't have any feedback to report.
Blog or not, doesn't change the chemistry. Well, we don't have to agree on everything, doc. That's fine.
Fix the cause of your pain rather than conceal the symptoms?
Ice will slow(not stop) the inflammation. The natural inflammation occurs to promote healing of the area. So, the ice will delay the healing and conceal the symptoms of injury, not fix anything.
http://sock-doc.com/2013/02/recover-prevent-injuries/
Additional info of symptom relief: This is why drugs like NSAIDS are horrible in these cases, as it will break the healing process of the tissue and cause scar tissue. It greatly stunts tissue regeneration (inhibits fibroblasts (cells that regenerate tissue) and macrophages (cells that clean the waste from area))
http://www.caringmedical.com/sports-injuries/nsaids-why-we-do-not-recommend-them/
I saw a vid from a sports doc that treats pro athletes and he suggested not using ice but instead heat and an estim unit. I thought it was a novel idea.
Draw blood in with nutrients and healing stuff and work out the debris thru the lymphatic system with the estim.
I haven't had a serious sprain to treat (knock on wood) so I don't have any feedback to report.
I'm not getting into a pissing match with you, I simply started a new thread to not block up 3 pages of stuff no one is going to read besides the 2 of you for the most part. No one deleted anything and you are thinking people make it through most of your posts and don't stop a few sentences in....However why should I post any of this info if someone else has a compunction to simply delete it, NOT!
Respects
Jim
-----------
Oh indeed PB a considerable portion of traditional medicine can and should be questioned but why some are opposed to posting the "evidence" on TID is beyond reason.
Perhaps I'm wrong but I believe some people come to TID for not only the opinions of it's members but a better understanding of medical therapeutics.
To not post articles or have debates on what that evidence is, misses the opportunity to help those when they are hungry for info. Rest assured to contend the best place for these discussions is in the back corner of TID where no one will read them is nuts.
For instance I've pulled and reviewed three of those articles referenced by K's blog. One was an in vitro analysis, another only followed their patients for TWO weeks, and another used a clinical test "drawer sign" to determine if the Patients ankle (ankle sprain patients) had healed. That test although once believed reliable has since been proven to be notoriously unreliable.
But is any of this so unbelievable since essentially all of those blog studies were conducted TWENTY YEARS AGO!
However why should I post any of this info if someone else has a compunction to simply delete it, NOT!
Respects
Jim
Jim we aren't deleting your posts that I am aware of. And we certainly support debate here at TID. If we didn't there would be nothing to discuss and no reason for the board to exist. You keep doing what you are doing. I think more people are reading what you post than you think. It's good stuff and we can put it to practice and see if it works.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic