Not true at all, people get the shingles vaccine because they don't want shingles again. Tons of people get shingles, and there are a few older threads here from a few guys that got shingles and they've never had the vaccine.
Also please go work for a pharmaceutical company and see the way drugs are tested, and retested, and how much time and money goes into a drug, please don't say drugs aren't tested. Because then I'm going to ask you to show me proof of how drugs aren't tested.
Now, back to the original post about Herpes.
No no sir. I will show you since you demand proof and these drugs ARE NOT tested on humans or in any significant trial whatsoever and the ones that are (all are to an "extent" determined by current regulations) have been done in 6 months or less in some cases. << This is just some cases obviously the overall process of pharmaceutical production is standardized streamlined and we know what we're getting.
Man, do you not realize or want to see that information is suppressed everywhere in some form, but pharmaceutical companies with billions at stake suddenly surrender themselves to moral obligation? Just a question, because Lipitor and Vioxx studies could have proved the drugs were dangerous but the evidence and trials were excluded.. done in a way to create a statistical significance that is means little or measuring irrelevancy.
I have experience in pharma labs and hospitals helping my dad work on million dollar anesthesia machines and diagnostics. 15 years of knowledge passed from doctors who lived and breathed everything medicine; they would say to stay away from this drug or that, "thats new on the market, reports of cancer.." This guy I'm speaking of specifically was a family friend and anesthesiologist him and my dad were friends.
Several studies exist that will show harmful effects of certain drugs, then its still being given to people,., the short time span of the studies, insignificant findings that are not even relevant to the actual test or question lol. In vaccines, for example, cdc documentation can show that huge spans of the vaccine product 'line' like MMR Varicella, dTap vaccines, etc are
not actually tested on people. I will get specifics. Or a study sample size was 8 people for a new vaccine for diabetes. I guess I'm just telling all you guys who are probably a lot older than me to look at the bullshit plain as day! Avoid it!
For a vaccine to be deemed effective, and that's what it needs for approval, all it has to show in the study is that antibodies were produced in response to administration. These are injected into your body or maybe your child's body.
NOW Back to the Herpes Discussion