I’ve criticized John Bolton and Victoria Nuland for their hawkish foreign policy strategies, but the claim they "faked chemical attacks" to manipulate U.S. military action in Syria lacks evidence and leans heavily on theories rather than established facts. What are the facts? I really want to know. If you have evidence please enlighten me. U.S. foreign policy, especially in a volatile region like Syria, is influenced by a bunch of complex geopolitical factors, and reducing it to the actions of just a couple of officials oversimplifies it. The Trump administration's unpredictability may have led to confusion and escalation in foreign affairs.