testboner
VIP Member
- Oct 10, 2010
- 1,677
- 2,111
Russia has frequently explained that the Ukraine people are not their enemy. They could have 100% dominated Ukraine well within a month start to finish if Ukraine was a true enemy to them. Their approach has had to be a slow approach of military and equipment depletion so as to kill as few non combatants, and forced combatants as possible. It’s in no way a matter of not being capable of steamrolling Ukraine. All of Ukraine’s capabilities were very rapidly destroyed - Ukraine itself was very early on defeated (left to fend for itself). US and its western cohorts are the only thing they’ve got and that can’t continue indefinitely, as everything provided is being destroyed.Hey TB, you may be correct, but I'm not sure you are. Russia should have walked all over Ukraine, but have not done so. Are they winning? Yes. But they've shown their equipment, comms, logistics, tactics, to be JV, at best. They don't want to get into a conventional war with anyone right now. They're low on equipment, spare part, ammunition, etc.
Russia gave NATO a front row seat to their capabilities. That's not good for them.
I agree with you that the US is on the verge of bankruptcy in the next 30 years. Russia in the next 10 years, and a good portion of BRICS in the next 10 years.
Russia should find a way to claim victory in Ukraine (as should the US and Ukraine), draw new lines and send everyone home. Then they should get back to the only thing they know how to do, and that is export energy. Bring that cash back home and get their house back in order. US should never have gotten involved in the first place. So stupid, and the crazy thing is that any sane discussion of the topic got you labelled as a Putin puppet, which is so moronic.
So far as Russia running low on arms, their production is the highest it’s ever been and they could continue pretty much indefinitely. Their output nowhere near exceeds their production rates.