There is so much to this....I hate to see the discussion devolve into name calling. But, that is where it usually goes.
Summary...and I may be out after this for a while. Good and busy at work.
Dominion/Democrats are fighting having to turn over source code or any info at all. They have wiped as much as they could....but, pretty sure DIA/305th has a copy of all their data. So, when anyone says, "Present evidence!" Well, other than affidavits (thousands of sworn affidavits by witnesses), there has been no discovery allowed by the defendants. AGAIN, NONE HAS BEEN ALLOWED by friendly judges and purchased legislatures. So, how can anyone have seen any evidence if none has been turned over? How can Bill Barr say he has seen evidence? He can't. But, if you read the affidavits and come away with anything other than this is a big scam, you are lost in a fog and likely will never come out.
But, in any event, I will make this real simple for you that think this is all a conspiracy theory.
Let's assume I am or was a criminal defense lawyer...I may have handled cases for people that made mistakes.....like DUI's, resisting arrest, assault, etc. Law enforcement has all the evidence. The body cam footage, the breath-alizer tests, the blood tests, everything. My client has nothing but his word (and maybe affidavits by witnesses) against the evidence they are holding. So, to get their evidence, I file a motion for DISCOVERY. Theoretically, LE would then turn over (or are supposed to turn over) everything they have that they will use to prosecute my client. On just about every occasion, the prosecution will file a motion to deny and say "We did everything by the book. It was perfect. Our officers were perfect. It was noon on a sunny day and it was 67 degrees. Our equipment functions perfectly in those conditions. We request the judge deny counsel's motion and move towards a plea deal to save this court a lot of time and money. Their request for discovery is a fishing expedition. Trust us. He is guilty."
Ok. That is with a criminal case. THIS IS WITH THE VOTING PROCESS OF THE USA. And, Dominion and democrats want to deny the voters requests to see source code and actual ballots? But, let's back up. The judges are throwing the cases out before the plaintiffs can even ask for discovery. Going back to my case above concerning the DUI, as counsel, am I to believe LE did everything by the book?...especially if I have affidavits to the contrary by people willing to go to prison if they lie in court? But, we can't even get there because the judge is crooked and the legislatures are bought and paid for.
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS FOR ALL OF YOU THAT READ THIS. R, D, L, I...no matter what you say you are. If you vote, this should matter!
Do you believe a voter should have the right at any time to examine a voting machine?
Do you believe thousands of Americans (that have written affidavits and have sworn under penalty of perjury) should be denied an opportunity to see their own ballots?
Do you believe the eyewitnesses to fraud should be denied the opportunity to look at whatever they want to look at?
Good God, they work for us. The machines are our machines. The code is ours. The ballots are ours. The most sacred and important parts of our system of government - but Dominion and democrats do not want anyone to ever have the opportunity to forensically review the ballots and software. They are hiding something. If you do not see that, you never will see anything.
ONE really funny part of this is that if Trump is re-elected, you may never see it on CNN or Fox. Remember, impeachment proceeding began before Trump took office and he was never recognized as President by some Americans and many members of Congress. So, if "we" (the Trumpers or whatever your name of the day is, it bothers me not) win, what difference will it make to never-Trumpers? Just a few more years of saying he's not your President. Hang in there. You may get your chance. I just hope the price is not too high.
Post quota met and maybe exceeded.
Good day.
Much respect.
-CC-