Forum Statistics

Threads
27,576
Posts
541,644
Members
28,554
Latest Member
pbtom
What's New?

How We Get Fat

guss

guss

MuscleHead
Aug 11, 2010
380
189
Ok, this is going to be a bit ranty but, trust me, I write better when I'm upset. If the Internet has proven anything to me over the years it's this: basic literacy is sorely lacking. Because the comments in response to the article I wrote on Excess Protein and Fat Storage indicates that not only can people not understand rather basic concepts, they insist on reading things into what I am saying that I have never said. I could rant about making uncritical inferences but I'll spare everyone that.

In that piece I answered a very specific question with a very specific answer. I made no implications of anything beyond the exact answer I gave to that specific question. And somehow people managed to read all kinds of asinine stuff into it, things that I never said or even began to imply. It'd amaze me if I hadn't seen people do this consistently over the past 15 years.

The basic confusion in that article was that folks interpreted my saying that carbs and protein can't be converted to fat as ‘Lyle says you can't get fat overeating carbs and protein'. Which I absolutely didn't say. But people inferred, incorrectly. Basically, what I said and what they heard were not the same thing.

I'd note before continuing that if folks had taken 30 seconds to click on and read the article I linked Nutrient Intake, Oxidation and Storage, they would have realized the mistake they were making as I specifically said that overeating carbs can still make you fat, just not through direct conversion (rather through indirect mechanisms). But in addition to a lack of basic literacy, laziness seems to be endemic on the net as well. And for not taking a couple of minutes to read the piece that I specifically linked to, a bunch of people got confused and then aggro.

I'd also note that if folks reading the protein piece had taken time to read the, I dunno, 200+ other articles on the site, they'd realize that I am making no such claim that you can eat all the carbs you want (or that lowcarb diets are superior, or whatever nonsensical conclusions they reached). Or that one specific dietary approach (e.g. lowcarbs) is automatically superior to another.

But rather than do that, they took a single article, addressing a single specific question, and ran with it. That's not a good thing to do, you can't take a single answer to a single specific question out of context and take that to represent what I believe. Well you can but it's stupid to do so. That's what a lot of people did.

But since they couldn't do any of that, couldn't take the time to even read the single linked article much less the rest of what's on the site, rather than writing about something more interesting today, I'm going to clear it up once and for all. And I still expect someone to read this completely wrong and go around the Internet mis-representing what I'm saying. I'm used to it at this point.

How We Get Fat Part 1: Energy Intake Exceeds Energy Output

At a fundamental level, fat storage occurs when caloric intake exceeds caloric output, a topic I discussed in some detail in The Energy Balance Equation. Now, I know that a lot of people claim that basic thermodynamics don't hold for humans. Simply, they are wrong. Invariably, the studies used to support this position are based on a faulty data set: to whit, they are drawing poor conclusions about what people SAY that they are eating.

For example, one popular book bases one of its many incorrect theses on a 1980 report suggesting that the obese ate the same number of calories as the lean. Ergo, obesity was caused by something else. The problem is this, the data set is wrong. A fact we've known for nearly 30 years but that the author was somehow unable to become aware of in his ‘5 years of dedicated research'.

Study after study after study over the past 30 years shows that the obese systematically under-report their food intake (by up to 30-50%) and over-report their activity (by about the same). So when they say they are only eating 1800 calories per day, they may be eating 2400-3600 calories per day. And their activity isn't nearly what they think.

And when you put those same folks in controlled metabolic ward conditions and control their food intake and/or activity output…voila, the energy balance equation holds. It's only when you believe the (incorrect) self-reported data that it doesn't.

And make no mistake I am NOT saying that the obese are lying about their intake, not consciously anyhow. Most people simply suck at knowing how much they are actually eating. Leave them to self-report it and they almost always screw it up. If you're mistaken enough to believe the self-reported values, you reach even more screwed up conclusions about things.

In that vein, I have found that the chronically underweight “I can't gain weight no matter what I do” are invariably vastly over-estimating what they are eating. That is, they are eating far less than they think. Other studies show that ‘health conscious people' tend to under-report their true ‘junk food' and dietary fat intake; to appear more healthy they conveniently forget or leave out that trip to the burger joint.

Put differently, this isn't something that only occurs in the obese (so spare me accusations of ‘hating the obese' or some nonsense). Am I clear or are people going to misinterpret me some more in the comments and claim I said that fat people lie about their food intake? Because I'm not saying anything of the sort. Make no mistake, I'm sure some do lie about it; most are just clueless about how much they are actually eating.

Now let me make it clear that there is obviously a lot more going on here, hormones and all manners of other stuff impact on the energy balance equation. For example, chronically elevated cortisol does a lot of nasty things in terms of reducing metabolic rate (reducing the energy out side of the equation) as well as negatively impacting on calorie partitioning (where calories go when you eat them as discussed in Calorie Partitioning Part 1 and Part 2). But for the most part, a lot of that is outside of our control. It's relevant but you can't do much with most of it. So I'll focus on calories.

How We Get Fat Part 2: Nutrient Intake, Oxidation and Storage Part Deux

The primary storage of fat in the body is in fat cells, duh. Most of that is found in what is called subcutaneous fat, which is found under the skin. There is also fat stored around the gut area called visceral fat (this surrounds the organs). Fat can also be stored in ‘bad' places like the liver and pancreas under certain conditions; this is called ectopic fat storage.

I'm going to focus here on subcutaneous fat. There, whether or not fat is stored or removed comes down to a concept called fat balance, which I discuss in some detail in The Ultimate Diet 2.0. You can think of fat balance as the fat specific equivalent of energy balance. That is

Net Change in Fat Stores = Fat Stored – Fat Burned

I'd note that the same nutrient balance holds for protein, carbohydrates and alcohol (which I'm not going to talk about today). That is, the net effect on bodily stores, whether protein or carbohydrate stores in the body increases, decreases or stays the same comes down to the balance of protein/carb stored vs. protein or carbs/burned.

So at a fundamental level, fat gain occurs when fat storage exceeds fat burning (technically oxidation). And fat loss occurs when fat oxidation exceeds fat storage. I'd note that both processes take place in some amounts throughout the day, controlled by a host of processes I'm not going to talk about. Just recognize that what happens over time in terms of your fat stores comes down to the relationship between those two processes: fat storage – fat oxidation.

So what determines fat oxidation and fat storage rates?

How We Get Fat Part 3: Back to Nutrient Intake, Oxidation and Storage

Now, here's where people got confused by Excess Protein Intake and Fat Storage – Q&A, and where they would have been unconfused by clicking the linked article on Nutrient Intake, Oxidation and Storage. In fact, I'd suggest you go read it right now, it's not that long and since I'm not going to retype all of it here (that's why I wrote it the first time), it'd be a good idea. I'll wait.

However, since I know most of you will have just ignored my suggestion to actually read that piece, I'm going to summarize a few points from it (as well as from the Q&A):

1. Carbs are rarely converted to fat and stored as such
2. When you eat more carbs you burn more carbs and less fat; eat less carbs and you burn less carbs and more fat
3. Protein is basically never going to be converted to fat and stored as such
4. When you eat more protein, you burn more protein (and by extension, less carbs and less fat); eat less protein and you burn less protein (and by extension, more carbs and more fat)
5. Ingested dietary fat is primarily stored, eating more of it doesn't impact on fat oxidation to a significant degree

Let's work through this backwards. When you eat dietary fat, it's primary fate is storage as its intake has very little impact on fat oxidation (and don't ask me a bunch of questions about “But people say you have to eat fat to burn fat?” in the comments. That idea is fundamentally wrong but would take an entire article to address). It also doesn't impact greatly on the oxidation of the protein or carbohydrates.

Carbohydrates are rarely converted to fat (a process called de novo lipogenesis) under normal dietary conditions. There are exceptions when this occurs. One is with massive chronic overfeeding of carbs. I'm talking 700-900 grams of carbs per day for multiple days. Under those conditions, carbs max out glycogen stores, are in excess of total daily energy requirements and you see the conversion of carbohydrate to fat for storage. But this is not a normal dietary situation for most people.

A few very stupid studies have shown that glucose INFUSION at levels of 1.5 total daily energy expenditure can cause DNL to occur but this is equally non-physiological. There is also some evidence that DNL may be increased in individuals with hyperinsulinemia (often secondary to obesity). There's one final exception that I'll use to finish this piece.

But when you eat more carbs, you burn more carbs and burn less fat. And that's why even if carbs aren't directly converted to fat and stored as such, excess carbs can STILL MAKE YOU FAT. Basically, by inhibiting fat oxidation, excess carbs cause you to store all the fat you're eating without burning any of it off. Did you get that? Let me repeat it again.

Carbs don't make you fat via direct conversion and storage to fat; but excess carbs can still make you fat by blunting out the normal daily fat oxidation so that all of the fat you're eating is stored. Which is why a 500 cal surplus of fat and a 500 cal surplus of carbs can both make you fat; they just do it for different reasons through different mechanisms. The 500 calories of excess fat is simply stored; the excess 500 calories of carbs ensure that all the fat you're eating is stored because carb oxidation goes up and fat oxidation goes down. Got it? If not, re-read this paragraph until it sinks in.

Oh yeah, the same holds for protein. Protein isn't going to be converted to and stored as fat. But eat excess protein and the body will burn more protein for energy (and less carbs and fat). Which means that the other nutrients have to get stored. Which means that excess protein can still make you fat, just not by direct conversion. Rather, it does it by ensuring that the fat you're eating gets stored.

Of course protein also has the highest thermic effect, more of the incoming calories are burned off. So excess protein tends to have the least odds of making you fat under any conditions; but excess protein can make you fat. Just not by direct conversion to fat; rather it's indirectly by decreasing the oxidation of other nutrients.

Ok, is the above clear enough? Because I can't really explain it any simpler but will try one last time using bullet points and an example. Let's assume someone is eating at exactly maintenance calories. Neither gaining nor losing fat. Here's what happens with excess calories. Assume that all three conditions represent identical increases in caloric intake, just from each of the different macros. Here's what happens mechanistically and why all three still make you fat:

1. Excess dietary fat is directly stored as fat
2. Excess dietary carbs increases carb oxidation, impairing fat oxidation; more of your daily fat intake is stored as fat
3. Excess dietary protein increases protein oxidation, impairing fat oxidation; more of your daily fat intake is stored as fat

Got it? All three situations make you fat, just through different mechanisms. Fat is directly stored and carbs and protein cause you to store the fat you're eating by decreasing fat oxidation.

And I'd note again, since someone will invariably misread this that that doesn't mean that a low-carb and/or low-protein diet is therefore superior for fat loss. I'm not saying that and don't think that I am. Because in such a situation, while you may be burning more fat, you're also eating more dietary fat. So net fat balance can be unchanged despite the dicking around with macronutrient content. It still comes down to the deficit.

The Obvious Question: Why Not Just Eat Zero Dietary Fat?

And now I'll answer the question that I know every person who has read (and hopefully understood) the above is asking: so if carbs and protein are rarely converted to and stored as fat, and make you fat by decreasing fat oxidation and causing all ingested dietary fat to get stored as fat, can't I eat as much as I want of protein and carbs so long as my dietary fat intake is zero?

And the asnswer is still no. Remember how I teased you above with one other exception, when carbs are converted to fat for storage? That exception is when dietary fat is below about 10% of total daily calories. Under that condition, the body ramps up de novo lipogenesis. So you still get fat.

Because the body is usually smarter than we are. Under conditions where dietary fat intake is ‘adequate' (meaning 10% of total calories or more), the primary fate of that fat is storage and protein and carbs are used for other things. And when dietary fat is too low, the body will start converting ingested carbs (and probably protein, though it would still be rare) to fat for storage.

Oh yeah, the other question you're going to ask in the comments “What about alcohol?” That's going to require a full article so be patient. I know that's another thing lacking on the Internet but so be it.

And I really hope that clears things up. If it doesn't, read this piece and the linked articles until it is.
 
sootywooty

sootywooty

MuscleHead
Sep 12, 2013
386
48
Also i think fatness is in the genetics to a certain extent, my BF has never increased much above 15%, and no one in the familes has either, and some do or did very little exercise.

I know many of my friends really struggle with wth issues, but of course many of them do very little in the way of high cardio exercises, but many walk and play a fair amount of golf and things like that.
 
Jasthace

Jasthace

MuscleHead
May 29, 2011
581
89
people insist on reading things into what I am saying that I have never said....In that piece I answered a very specific question with a very specific answer. I made no implications of anything beyond the exact answer I gave to that specific question. And somehow people managed to read all kinds of asinine stuff into it, things that I never said or even began to imply. It'd amaze me if I hadn't seen people do this consistently over the past 15 years.

Yes , its kind of like Magic .. peoples minds like to interprete things the way the want to see it .....
 
shortz

shortz

Beard of Knowledge VIP
May 6, 2013
3,107
897
Also i think fatness is in the genetics to a certain extent, my BF has never increased much above 15%, and no one in the familes has either, and some do or did very little exercise.

I know many of my friends really struggle with wth issues, but of course many of them do very little in the way of high cardio exercises, but many walk and play a fair amount of golf and things like that.

If you have something genetic, that's going to be something metabolic, and if it's metabolic, it can be treated. If you can't lose fat due to a genetic issue, that can only mean you're being non-compliant with your medical treatment and still not eating right. My entire family is morbidly obese. I am not, however, because I realized the genetic bullshit is an excuse.
 
sityslicker1

sityslicker1

TID Board Of Directors
Oct 6, 2010
938
437
1. Excess dietary fat is directly stored as fat
2. Excess dietary carbs increases carb oxidation, impairing fat oxidation; more of your daily fat intake is stored as fat
3. Excess dietary protein increases protein oxidation, impairing fat oxidation; more of your daily fat intake is stored as fat

So if all this hold true, what is the ideal ratio of macros for fat loss? The only take away advice I got from the article is not to let dietary fat fall below 10% which I heard before.
 
sootywooty

sootywooty

MuscleHead
Sep 12, 2013
386
48
If you have something genetic, that's going to be something metabolic, and if it's metabolic, it can be treated. If you can't lose fat due to a genetic issue, that can only mean you're being non-compliant with your medical treatment and still not eating right. My entire family is morbidly obese. I am not, however, because I realized the genetic bullshit is an excuse.

Yes i agree with what you are saying! Mayb i worded it abit wrong, i am not saying one cannot lose fat, but just that some bodys have a propensity to gain higher fat contents more easily, just as some people gain muscle tissue more easily, even if on a similar diet and training schedule to another person. Also Ectomorphics body types seem to be inclined to gain fat more easily than others.
 
Blacken

Blacken

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2013
212
40
This article breaks everything down and makes it very understandable thanks for the great post.

I agree with you as well Sooty. I think people have different genetics to handle body fat. However this is a excellent starting post to understanding fat.

I once read an article that equated diets based on genetic heritage. It basically talked about why people bloat with certain foods because they didn't have them in there ancestry. For example my white ass bloats to hell with certain rice while my Indian and Asian friends don't bloat but give them a potato and they do.

I also tend to handle fat better then most people but not carbs. However you need a foundation to start with before you can start to figure yourself out.
 
C

Culbert

New Member
Nov 29, 2013
3
0
Great read and will be of great info and help for those who are over weight and for those also who have engaged in regular workouts but not losing weight.
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 0 members watching this topic

Top