J
jaejay
Member
- Oct 11, 2010
- 29
- 2
So, fact of the matter is that I have a lot of excess estrogen in my system from a previous, wet cycle.
Now, instead of going the usual way about it, running aromasin, arimidex and a low dose of test until the estrogen clears out, I was thinking about running masteron only for the amount of time that it will take for me to tank or at least clear out any excess estrogen that I might have at this present moment.
Testosterone is a good base because, it's testosterone. It's THE hormone. But in terms of mood and sexual function, it really boils down to DHT and estrogen. Masteron provides me with the DHT properties, and as earlier mentioned, I will still have a lot of estrogen in my body. Until the estrogen is evened out, my plan is to run zero aromatizing compounds, and only include masteron and arimidex until I can feel that my estrogen is settling, to which I will start running testosterone again.
I'm wondering if anyone ever tried this approach and would be able to share their good/bad experiences with this. Practically, however, I don't see any issue with going about it like this.
Now, instead of going the usual way about it, running aromasin, arimidex and a low dose of test until the estrogen clears out, I was thinking about running masteron only for the amount of time that it will take for me to tank or at least clear out any excess estrogen that I might have at this present moment.
Testosterone is a good base because, it's testosterone. It's THE hormone. But in terms of mood and sexual function, it really boils down to DHT and estrogen. Masteron provides me with the DHT properties, and as earlier mentioned, I will still have a lot of estrogen in my body. Until the estrogen is evened out, my plan is to run zero aromatizing compounds, and only include masteron and arimidex until I can feel that my estrogen is settling, to which I will start running testosterone again.
I'm wondering if anyone ever tried this approach and would be able to share their good/bad experiences with this. Practically, however, I don't see any issue with going about it like this.