Latest posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
27,924
Posts
548,892
Members
28,676
Latest Member
anabolicpolicy.com
What's New?

Bidens replacement? Thoughts on the new ticket?

M

Massive G

VIP Member
Apr 10, 2020
1,277
1,508
It's obvious he's being forced out just wondering who the new president and vice president they place on the ticket?
What do you guys think?
 
beefnewton

beefnewton

VIP Member
Nov 11, 2022
1,630
1,945
I think a Schumer and Schiff ticket would be wildly popular... or swap one of them out for McConnell. Hell maybe even a Bolton and Graham ticket... that would be fantastic for Ukraine and change absolutely nothing, which all Dems should support.
 
3

3084life

Member
Mar 29, 2023
73
30
Pete and Michelle, would be a win for the D's. There would be a massive gay, black and woman turnout, a landslide would be an understatement.
 
fasttwitch

fasttwitch

VIP Member
Mar 17, 2011
645
813
My guess is they stay with Hillary 2.0, better known as Harris. Harris is a completely sold out corporate shill so the donor class loves her.
 
Last edited:
1bigun11

1bigun11

MuscleHead
Oct 23, 2010
2,151
1,853
It's going to be a mess I think.

Biden has lots of delegates pledged to him from the primaries if he stays in, and my understanding is that if Biden drops out those delegates become free at the convention to vote for whoever the hell they want. I think the convention will be like a bunch of drunk cardinals trying to pick a pope, with round after round of voting, wheeling and dealing behind the scenes, till an eventual winner becomes obvious.
 
fasttwitch

fasttwitch

VIP Member
Mar 17, 2011
645
813
It's going to be a mess I think.

Biden has lots of delegates pledged to him from the primaries if he stays in, and my understanding is that if Biden drops out those delegates become free at the convention to vote for whoever the hell they want. I think the convention will be like a bunch of drunk cardinals trying to pick a pope, with round after round of voting, wheeling and dealing behind the scenes, till an eventual winner becomes obvious.

True. The delegates are free to choose if released. But if Biden directs his delegates to choose a certain person, the odds are most will listen.

Personally, I love political chaos on all sides. Red cult and blue cult. This should be fun.
 
tommyguns2

tommyguns2

Senior Moderators
Staff Member
Dec 25, 2010
6,611
5,638
RCP betting odds are leaning toward Harris as the nominee. I guess the delegates might choose her if Biden tells his delegates to shift that direction, but she face-planted in the primaries, and doesn't really have a strong constituency. She's definitely not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Perhaps it's her and she tries to get a VP that will help her carry a state such as PA or WI, which are both leaning toward Trump right now, but not by much.

I've heard that Dem donations have dried up over 50%. I wonder if that continues or if pushing out Biden and bringing in somebody changes things. Hard to believe that any strong candidates want to be considered, as the present Dem party seems to be a mess. Perhaps it's better politically to wait for 2028, and let the Dem party get its butt kicked in November.
 
monsoon

monsoon

Senior Bacon VIP
Nov 1, 2010
5,160
1,966
I read the other day that no one wants to be Harris’ VP so I put together a
List of possible volume candidates;
Mondale
Dukakis
Clinton
Brown
Adams
Pritzger
 
fasttwitch

fasttwitch

VIP Member
Mar 17, 2011
645
813
RCP betting odds are leaning toward Harris as the nominee. I guess the delegates might choose her if Biden tells his delegates to shift that direction, but she face-planted in the primaries, and doesn't really have a strong constituency. She's definitely not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Perhaps it's her and she tries to get a VP that will help her carry a state such as PA or WI, which are both leaning toward Trump right now, but not by much.

I've heard that Dem donations have dried up over 50%. I wonder if that continues or if pushing out Biden and bringing in somebody changes things. Hard to believe that any strong candidates want to be considered, as the present Dem party seems to be a mess. Perhaps it's better politically to wait for 2028, and let the Dem party get its butt kicked in November.
I agree with almost everything you said. But, no matter who runs the election will be razer thin by November. All the polls look one way months out and then tighten up towards November. We can be honest.. The conservatives will vote for Trump , no matter what. And the Liberals will vote for whatever person the Democratic party put in front of them. No matter who it is.

All that matters is the true independents Not the angry disaffected conservatives who say they are independents or the angry disaffected lefties who say they are independent. These people are independent in name only. They are disillusioned optimists. But I mean the real independents. They are typically 1) low information voters. These people only tune into politics right before decision time. 2) they don't usually do polls 3) They decide who to vote for very close to election day 4) They often vote personality (how they feel about the person)

These people decide. Everyone else is a wasted vote. Take all the conservatives votes and liberals votes and just toss them into a garbage can. They do not matter.

Of course, in reality it does not matter anyway. Trump and all the Democrats all work for the deep state. Ever see the video of Trump signing the tax law into effect? He used several pens to sign it. He turned around in the signing ceremony and gave the second pen to Goldman Sachs. Yeah.. Some of us did not miss that. The Trump phenomena is a dog and pony show for the right wing. The deep state wants to appease the right wingers by making them feel represented. (This is how the deep state takes the energy out of a potential civil war / revolution). Make people feel like they have a voice. It is not real. Trump is just a tool that the deep state is using to play the right.
 
testboner

testboner

VIP Member
Oct 10, 2010
1,551
1,917
Shit show no matter who it is.
I still wouldn’t participate, but could imagine Kennedy as a viable replacement for the DEMS. They won’t do that, but he said he’d consider the idea.
To me it truly makes no difference who the president or administration is — it’s all still gov’t and I’m anarchist in the sense of (it isn’t proper for) there being a centralized (monopoly) system of control over a supposedly “Free” people.
 
Who is viewing this thread?

There are currently 0 members watching this topic

Top