I'll go 1st. Sythol the biggest fraud, hoax to ever be introduced to BB world.:homo:
lol,can you tell us how you really feel about synthol please.I think anyone who knows me on these boards know how I feel about it.
Fuc k Syhthol and any egotistical prick who uses it. I don't care how much muscle you built natty or how many years you have trained, the second you inject Syhthol you are a fake mother fuc ker.
I think anyone who knows me on these boards know how I feel about it.
Fuc k Syhthol and any egotistical prick who uses it. I don't care how much muscle you built natty or how many years you have trained, the second you inject Syhthol you are a fake mother fuc ker.
I don't have a problem when it's used as intended but it was never designed to "balloon" your muscle, only to help stretch the muscle fascia in order to help speed muscle growth and not to "fill" a muscle to the point it all looks like mush.
I find it completely okay.
Bodybuilding isn't powerlifting, it's not a feat of strength or a show of gymnastics. It's purely based on looks, that's it. There is no quantifiable tests like dexa scans to compare results it is 100% subjective and open to bias. It's not based on how you achieved the look, it's just based on what you look like. So for that reason I'm fine with people using synthol to enhance their look. We use steroids to enhance our looks and that's fine, so is synthol. The big argue ment is only about people who abuse it and over do things but that exact same argument can be used for steroids. And we also use other supplements for almost everything so why shouldn't synthol be included in that wide arsenal? It's obvious a few of the pro's use it and I must admit if I was at that level I would too.
If there were a pill that when taken for a week would draw so much water into your muscles that you would gain 30 lbs and look solid, would you take it?
Zomb131 said:Synthol like aas is another tool in bodybuilding.
There are currently 0 members watching this topic